2012
DOI: 10.1123/japa.20.1.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the IPAQ-Short Form and Accelerometry Predictions of Physical Activity in Older Adults

Abstract: Older adult physical activity (PA) levels obtained from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire–Short Form (IPAQ) and accelerometry (ACC) were compared. Mean difference scores between accumulated or bout ACC PA and the IPAQ were computed. Spearman rank-order correlations were used to assess relations between time spent in PA measured from ACC and self-reported form of the IPAQ, and percentage agreement across measures was used to classify meeting or not meeting PA recommendations. The IPAQ significan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
58
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
58
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They suggested that the IPAQ-SF overestimates the level of physical activity. This idea was also supported by other studies [38,39]. Therefore, the use of other questionnaires or equipment that directly assess daily movement (e.g., accelerometer) [30] could provide more accurate measurements, leading to better conclusions about the effect of physical activity on blood pressure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…They suggested that the IPAQ-SF overestimates the level of physical activity. This idea was also supported by other studies [38,39]. Therefore, the use of other questionnaires or equipment that directly assess daily movement (e.g., accelerometer) [30] could provide more accurate measurements, leading to better conclusions about the effect of physical activity on blood pressure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The IPAQ-SF is validated for use on adults aged 18–65 [69]. Validity is not established for older adults but the questionnaire has been used in recent studies on older adults [70,71]. Table 1 reports the characteristics of the sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recommended by Choi et al [30], a period of at least 90 minutes of consecutive zeros was defined as non-wear time. A valid day was defined as a day that contained at least 10 hours of accelerometer data and participants with less than five valid days were excluded from further analyses [19,31]. Based on this, 25 participants were excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%