2010
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/47/1a/01003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the INMETRO and NIST Josephson Voltage Standards (part of the ongoing regional key comparison SIM.EM.BIPM-K10.b.1)

Abstract: A direct comparison of the 10 V Josephson Voltage Standards (JVS) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA, and the Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Normalização e Qualidade Industrial (INMETRO), Brazil, was made in June 2009. The process consisted of two comparisons, first using the NIST CJVS's measuring system (hardware and software) to measure the 10 V reference voltage provided by the INMETRO JVS and then using the INMETRO JVS's measuring system to measure the 10 V reference volta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Three key-comparisons, linked to the above mentioned ones were performed in the Inter-American Metrology System (SIM) Regional Metrology Organization, so far: the SIM.EM.BIPM-K11.b (in 2006, using Zeners for an indirect on-site comparison, resulting in 4.32 parts in 10 9 of expanded uncertainty, k=2) [5], the SIM.EM.BIPM-K10.b (in 2007, in a direct on-site JVS comparison, reaching 2.07 parts in 10 10 of expanded uncertainty, k=2) [6] and the SIM.EM.BIPM-K10.b.1 (in 2009, in a direct on-site JVS comparison, reaching 1.48 parts in 10 10 of expanded uncertainty, k=2) [7]. There are no records of off-site indirect (via Zeners) JVS key-comparison within the SIM, like the most recent one, performed between the BIPM and the KEBS (Kenya), in 2017 (BIPM.EM-K11.a&b, which resulted in 1.55 parts in 10 7 of expanded uncertainty, k=2) [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Three key-comparisons, linked to the above mentioned ones were performed in the Inter-American Metrology System (SIM) Regional Metrology Organization, so far: the SIM.EM.BIPM-K11.b (in 2006, using Zeners for an indirect on-site comparison, resulting in 4.32 parts in 10 9 of expanded uncertainty, k=2) [5], the SIM.EM.BIPM-K10.b (in 2007, in a direct on-site JVS comparison, reaching 2.07 parts in 10 10 of expanded uncertainty, k=2) [6] and the SIM.EM.BIPM-K10.b.1 (in 2009, in a direct on-site JVS comparison, reaching 1.48 parts in 10 10 of expanded uncertainty, k=2) [7]. There are no records of off-site indirect (via Zeners) JVS key-comparison within the SIM, like the most recent one, performed between the BIPM and the KEBS (Kenya), in 2017 (BIPM.EM-K11.a&b, which resulted in 1.55 parts in 10 7 of expanded uncertainty, k=2) [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Desde sua previsão em 1962 [1] e rápida confirmação em 1963 [2], o efeito Josephson tem desempenhado um importante papel na ciência, estando presente em estudos atuais de dinâmica de sólitons [3], implementação de bits quânticos [4], metrologia [6,5], supercondutividade de alta temperatura crítica [7] e mecânica quântica de variáveis macroscópicas [8], entre outros exemplos.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Até onde sabemos, apenas dois grupos tentaram desenvolver trabalhos nessa linha. Um deles no Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, o INMETRO, que, em colaboração com o NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology, EUA), estuda dispositivos baseados em redes de junções Josephsons capazes de gerar a definição mais precisa que a humanidade conhece do volt [5]. O outro grupo, trabalhando no Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), explorou outra capacidade de medição com alta sensibilidade disponibilizada pelo efeito Josephson, agora no campo do magnetismo [9].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified