1993
DOI: 10.3354/dao016181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the fluorescent antibody test (FAT) for measuring the prevalences and levels of Renibacterium salmoninarum in wild and hatchery stocks of salmonid fishes in Alaska. USA

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the fluorescent antibody test (FAT) were compared for their sensitivity in detection of Renibacterjum salmoninarum (Rs) in kidney tissues of Alaskan salmonids. The ELISA appeared to be more sensitive in detecting Rs infections. The FAT did not detect Rs in 80 % of the ELISA-positive samples but was positive for Rs in 28 'K, of the samples that were ELISA-negative. This contradiction may have been due to low-level washover of Rs cells from smears conta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(35 reference statements)
4
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation was consistent with current hatchery operations in which the greatest fish Typical Rs cells were detected by FAT in the kidney tissues from fish in I seawater and freshwater when corresponding ELISA OD values were 11.0 (Meyers et al 1993a). No crossreacting bacteria were observed by the FAT in kidney tissues or water samples that could potentially have confounded the ELISA results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This observation was consistent with current hatchery operations in which the greatest fish Typical Rs cells were detected by FAT in the kidney tissues from fish in I seawater and freshwater when corresponding ELISA OD values were 11.0 (Meyers et al 1993a). No crossreacting bacteria were observed by the FAT in kidney tissues or water samples that could potentially have confounded the ELISA results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Kidney samples producing ELISA optical density (OD) values 20.095 were considered positive for the Rs antigen. Ktdney tissues having hlgher ELISA OD values approaching 1.0 were examined by the indirect and the drect fluorescent antibody tests (FAT) to confirm the presence of the Rs organism (Meyers et al 1993a). The direct FAT used the same anti-Rs antiserum as the ELISA, but the antiserum was conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate instead of horseradish peroxidase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A direct fluorescent antibody test (FAT) for Renibacterium salmoninarum was also performed on kidney smears from the Graveyard Point herring using methods described by Meyers et al (1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low numbers of R. salmoninarum (from 1 to 5 or 6 to 50) in kidney smears tested by FAT have previously been shown to be ELISA-negative in a study which compared the 2 detection methods (Meyers et al 1993). Consequently, low numbers of R. salmoninarum detected by FAT may not represent high infection levels or clinically diseased fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%