1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01322665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the entire nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of the attenuated hog cholera vaccine strain GPE? and the wild-type parental strain ALD

Abstract: Comparison of the entire nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of the attenuated hog cholera vaccine strain GPE-and the wild-type parental strain ALD Summary. We have determined the complete nucleotide sequences of a live attenuated hog cholera virus (HCV) and its progenitor strain. The viral RNA of each strain consisted of 12 298 nucleotides including untranslated regions of 373 and 228 bases at the 5' and 3' end, respectively. There was a single large open reading flame spanning 11697 nucleotides which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No sequence differences were found in the 5Ј and 3Ј NTRs of Brescia C1.1.1 and CoBrB 476 R strains, suggesting that these regions of the genome do not determine the virulence of the two viruses. The amino acid sequences of C1.1.1 (25) and CoBrB 476 R were compared with those of CSFV strains Alfort (26), ALD (14), GPE Ϫ (14), and C (23). Except for the amino acid at position 2846 in nonstructural protein NS5A, the amino acids of virulent CoBrB 476 R and other virulent and avirulent CSFV strains are conserved compared to those of the C1.1.1 sequence (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No sequence differences were found in the 5Ј and 3Ј NTRs of Brescia C1.1.1 and CoBrB 476 R strains, suggesting that these regions of the genome do not determine the virulence of the two viruses. The amino acid sequences of C1.1.1 (25) and CoBrB 476 R were compared with those of CSFV strains Alfort (26), ALD (14), GPE Ϫ (14), and C (23). Except for the amino acid at position 2846 in nonstructural protein NS5A, the amino acids of virulent CoBrB 476 R and other virulent and avirulent CSFV strains are conserved compared to those of the C1.1.1 sequence (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggested that the surface properties of CSFV generated in pigs and carrying 476 Ser in the C terminus of E rns are distinct from those of genetically identical virus produced in cell culture. Field isolates and laboratory strains of CSFV vary considerably in their virulence, but until now, no genetic determinants of virulence could be defined despite extensive efforts in sequencing and detailed phylogenetic studies (14,35). The same holds true for the search for in vitro parameters that would allow grouping of viruses into virulence classes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 46 amino acid differences were found between the parent ALD virus and the GPE Ϫ vaccine strain (22). Since the pathogenicity of the triple mutant GPE Ϫ virus is not as high as the pathogenicity of the original ALD virus, additional changes are likely to determine the virulence of the ALD strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pigs inoculated with the GPE Ϫ vaccine were completely protected from challenge virus infection and replication (34,49). Comparison of the genomes of the GPE Ϫ vaccine virus and the parent ALD virus revealed 225 nucleotide substitutions and 46 amino acid differences (22), which did not provide any conclusive information on the molecular basis of the attenuation. Numerous reports suggest that the viral proteins N pro , C, E rns , E1, E2, p7, and NS4B may be involved in determining the virulence of CSFV in pigs (7,8,9,10,11,12,13,32,36,37,38,39,40,43,46,54).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A known example is that GPE − vaccine virus was obtained from an ALD strain after multiple passages in swine testicle, bovine testicle and guinea-pig kidney cells [11]. They were not clustered closely in both the E rns and E2 trees.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysis Of E Rns and E2 Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%