Vehicular Technology Conference Fall 2000. IEEE VTS Fall VTC2000. 52nd Vehicular Technology Conference (Cat. No.00CH37152)
DOI: 10.1109/vetecf.2000.887111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the electromagnetic properties of building materials at 5.8 GHz and 62.4 GHz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as the brick wall is concerned, values of ε R and σ in Table 3 are not in full agreement with the existing experimental studies, where ε R values at millimeter frequencies between 2.55 [25] and 4.4 [27] have been found, and σ up to 1.4 S/m has been proposed [25]. A general, rather clear conclusion can be however drawn from the overall different investigations: if compared to the values commonly adopted at UHF frequencies (ε R ≈ 5, σ ≈ 10 -2 around 1 GHz [22,28]), the permittivity value at mm-wave is basically the same, whereas the conductivity is increased by one/two order of magnitude, that is also in agreement with the already discussed increase of the obstruction loss experienced at mm-waves.…”
Section: Rt Parameters Tuningcontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As far as the brick wall is concerned, values of ε R and σ in Table 3 are not in full agreement with the existing experimental studies, where ε R values at millimeter frequencies between 2.55 [25] and 4.4 [27] have been found, and σ up to 1.4 S/m has been proposed [25]. A general, rather clear conclusion can be however drawn from the overall different investigations: if compared to the values commonly adopted at UHF frequencies (ε R ≈ 5, σ ≈ 10 -2 around 1 GHz [22,28]), the permittivity value at mm-wave is basically the same, whereas the conductivity is increased by one/two order of magnitude, that is also in agreement with the already discussed increase of the obstruction loss experienced at mm-waves.…”
Section: Rt Parameters Tuningcontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Such approach has been also extended to the electromagnetic parameters of the OUT (relative permittivity-ε R -and electrical conductivity-σ), in order to estimate their values for the OUT never addressed so far (e.g., the monitor or the bookshelf ) or to consolidate their evaluation for the most common objects (like the wall sample and the wooden panel), still not reliably and extensively investigated at mm-waves in the few studies available in the literature ( [25][26][27] for a brick wall).…”
Section: Rt Parameters Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical relative permittivity and conductivity for different building materials are reported by [23] and [24] while a comparative study between 5.8 GHz and 62.4 GHz is given by [25]. ITU-R recommendation 2040-1 [26] provides an expression for the conductivity σ -which gives rise to the dB/m specific attenuation factor -as a function of frequency f in GHz Reported penetration losses at 60 GHz are on the order of some dBs for very thin plastic, wood or plaster partitions, 4 dB for a 0.7 cm single-panel tempered glass and 25 dB for a 9 cm indoor brick wall when both the transmit and receive antennas are vertically polarised [28] [29].…”
Section: Propagation Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For outdoor urban databases, a good accuracy can be attained through aerial stereo photogrammetry instead of using satellite images, but even in this case the error still has a lower bound of about 0.5 m. The representation of the scenario must include both its geometrical and electromagnetic properties. For reference, the electrical permittivity and the conductivity values measured on some common building materials at millimetre frequencies are listed in Table 2 [24], [25], [58]- [60]. RT models represent an appropriate choice when it comes to deterministic, mm-wave propagation and channel modelling.…”
Section: A Deterministic and Semi-deterministic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our simulation settings, the ray-tracer accounts for up to 6 reflections, 2 penetrations, and 1 diffraction for each ray. The material properties are frequency-dependent, and the parameters of dielectric constant ε r and conductivity σ in this paper are estimated for the 6 GHz spectrum band based on the material properties in different bands [36][37][38][39]. The buildings are assumed to be concrete with the dielectric constant ε r = 6 94 and σ = 0 73S/m, respectively.…”
Section: Measurement Setup and Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%