2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of a new once-a-week matricial estradiol transdermal system (Estrapatch® 40 and Estrapatch® 60) with a twice week system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, 330 were excluded; 59 included fewer than 20 women per study arm and 54 were not an RCT; 126 did not clearly state a sample size calculation; 52 did not measure vasomotor symptoms as the primary outcome; 39 were secondary analysis. Following these exclusions, 214 RCT were included…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, 330 were excluded; 59 included fewer than 20 women per study arm and 54 were not an RCT; 126 did not clearly state a sample size calculation; 52 did not measure vasomotor symptoms as the primary outcome; 39 were secondary analysis. Following these exclusions, 214 RCT were included…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transdermal delivery of estrogens and progestogens for contraception and hormone replacement therapy has been evaluated in numerous researches (Agrawal and Pruthi, 2011;Burkman, 2007;Raynaud, 2005). The use of long acting implants and patches are currently two conventional methods that are available in the pharmaceutical markets for this indication (Chrisman et al, 2006;Mansour et al, 2011;Toole et al, 2002;Caruso, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%