2021
DOI: 10.12669/pjms.37.5.3465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the effectiveness of novel intervention on restricted range of motion of shoulder in young healthy subjects

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of four novel and pragmatic interventions on the restricted range of motion (ROM) of shoulder joint in healthy subjects. Methods: The study was conducted at Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, Mansehra, in 6-months duration. This quasi-experimental study recruited 120 young subjects with an equal proportion of males and females for four novel intervention groups (n=30 each group) including pragmatic posterior capsular stretch, Serratus anterior stre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dominant shoulder joint in players had a GIRD of 15.3 ±8.5 degrees. Increment in internal rotation following the intervention were seen in both groups, which is in consensus with previous research concluding that internal rotation deficit is responsive to conservative treatments (Keramat & Babur, 2021) Mansehra, in 6-months duration. This quasi-experimental study recruited 120 young subjects with an equal proportion of males and females for four novel intervention groups (n = 30 each group End range joint mobilization is a widely accepted intervention for improving range of motion of a restricted joint.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The dominant shoulder joint in players had a GIRD of 15.3 ±8.5 degrees. Increment in internal rotation following the intervention were seen in both groups, which is in consensus with previous research concluding that internal rotation deficit is responsive to conservative treatments (Keramat & Babur, 2021) Mansehra, in 6-months duration. This quasi-experimental study recruited 120 young subjects with an equal proportion of males and females for four novel intervention groups (n = 30 each group End range joint mobilization is a widely accepted intervention for improving range of motion of a restricted joint.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%