2001
DOI: 10.2989/16085910109503725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the density and species composition of aquatic invertebrates found between the roots ofEichhornia crassipesplants from two coastal lakes in northern KwaZulu-Natal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Aside from providing a physical habitat for organisms, differences in invertebrate densities between artificial and natural substrata could be partly explained by increased food availability to grazers via growth of epiphytic algae (Carpenter & Lodge, 1986;Underwood & Thomas, 2006) or by protection of prey species from benthivorous fish, known to be present in the area (Hofman, 2007). Invertebrate densities in artificial plants, however, were comparable to densities seen in North Holland ditches in 1985 (when macrophytes were present) and within the ranges of those found in other lentic fresh waters with submerged macrophytes (Vijoen, Cyrus & Wepener, 2001;Storey, 2007;Verdonschot et al, 2011). Additionally, it takes time for periphyton communities to develop on Plastic Plants, and although the artificial substrata were left in the field for more than 50 days before sampling, we assume this food source is more readily available on natural vegetation.…”
Section: Consequences Of Submerged Macrophyte Loss For Benthic Invertsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Aside from providing a physical habitat for organisms, differences in invertebrate densities between artificial and natural substrata could be partly explained by increased food availability to grazers via growth of epiphytic algae (Carpenter & Lodge, 1986;Underwood & Thomas, 2006) or by protection of prey species from benthivorous fish, known to be present in the area (Hofman, 2007). Invertebrate densities in artificial plants, however, were comparable to densities seen in North Holland ditches in 1985 (when macrophytes were present) and within the ranges of those found in other lentic fresh waters with submerged macrophytes (Vijoen, Cyrus & Wepener, 2001;Storey, 2007;Verdonschot et al, 2011). Additionally, it takes time for periphyton communities to develop on Plastic Plants, and although the artificial substrata were left in the field for more than 50 days before sampling, we assume this food source is more readily available on natural vegetation.…”
Section: Consequences Of Submerged Macrophyte Loss For Benthic Invertsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In total, 68 taxa belonging to 34 families were captured from the various samples, with an average density of 1644 ind./m 2 . The results of this study showed higher taxon richness (68 taxa recorded), compared with the study of Viljoen et al (2001) performed in two coastal lakes, Lakes Cubhu and Nsezi in northern KwaZulu-Natal (55 and 54 taxa reported respectively). On the other hand, Rocha-Ramírez et al (2007) found 96 invertebrate taxa in a study performed principally in brackish water systems, the Alvarado Lagoon System of Veracruz in Mexico.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Le choix porté sur ce macrophyte pour la récolte des macro-invertébrés est lié à son abondance dans les zones calmes et à la densité de son système racinaire qui peut être un habitat favorable pour ces êtres vivants aquatiques (Viljoen et al, 2001).…”
Section: Jacinthe D'eauunclassified