2013
DOI: 10.1111/fwb.12252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrophyte loss drives decadal change in benthic invertebrates in peatland drainage ditches

Abstract: Summary Agricultural peatlands and their associated drainage systems are often highly managed and exposed to anthropogenic pressures, such as eutrophication and stable water tables, maintained via drainage during periods of high rainfall and inlet of, alkaline‐rich, waters during dry periods. These pressures promote peat degradation, resulting in the accumulation of fine‐degraded peat particles that dramatically alter aquatic habitats by smothering surfaces and decreasing water quality. Consequential effects… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…stands, thus increase the diversity of benthic macroinvertebrates among the macrophyte stems. On the other hand, the substantial decline in macroinvertebrate diversity corresponded significantly to a reduction in the structural heterogeneity in the water bodies; this is similar to the results of studies on Lago di Candia, northern Italy (Cremona et al, 2008) and peat ditches in the Netherlands (Whatley et al, 2014). Rotifers and ciliates, which comprised a considerable proportion of the plankton and epiphyton diversity, did not differ significantly among the studied water bodies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…stands, thus increase the diversity of benthic macroinvertebrates among the macrophyte stems. On the other hand, the substantial decline in macroinvertebrate diversity corresponded significantly to a reduction in the structural heterogeneity in the water bodies; this is similar to the results of studies on Lago di Candia, northern Italy (Cremona et al, 2008) and peat ditches in the Netherlands (Whatley et al, 2014). Rotifers and ciliates, which comprised a considerable proportion of the plankton and epiphyton diversity, did not differ significantly among the studied water bodies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The management practices, primarily designed to maintain the hydrological functioning (conveyance of water) may actually inadvertently promote and enhance aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity. Ditch cleaning Fairly high, high and very high conservation value scores are presented in bold and dredging has been shown to positively influence Trichoptera presence in ditches (Twisk et al, 2000), and dredging can remove nutrient-rich sediment (Whatley et al, 2014a) and reset ditch habitats to an earlier successional stages (Clarke, 2015). The rotational management of sites over time means a variety of vegetation successional stages will be present across the sites and collectively these provide a wide range of habitats suitable for macroinvertebrates (Painter et al, 1999;Clarke, 2015).…”
Section: Macroinvertebrate Biodiversity and Community Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the studied ponds had high concentrations of two herbicides, butachlor and pentoxazone (S2 Fig), which were far higher than their acute toxicity levels for the ecotoxicological bioindicator Raphidocelis subcapitata (72-h ErC50, 3.15 μg/L [33] and 0.79 μg/L [34], respectively). The decline of macrophytes can drive decadal change in benthic invertebrates [35]. To clarify this viewpoint, we transformed the percentages of floating-leaved plant coverage and emergent plant coverage into the area percentages not covered by these types of plants, as follows: 100 – (floating-leaved plant coverage) and 100 – (emergent plant coverage), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%