2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the 18-item and 6-item Lubben Social Network Scales with community-dwelling older adults in Mongolia

Abstract: This study compares the psychometric properties of two versions of the Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-18 and LSNS-6) with community dwelling older adults in Mongolia. We recruited 650 older adult in the capital city of Ulaanbaatar and the country’s four rural regions. We used the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), the Short Form 12 (SF-12) physical and mental health functioning measures, and a multi-dimensional scale of social isolation for confirmatory factor analyses of the LSNS-18 and the LSNS-6. Both … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we only focused on supportive relationships because a previous study revealed no significant association between aversive relationships and sleep quality [ 20 ]. Generally, the LSNS cut-off is used for social isolation with less than 12 points [ 27 ], and high scores on the LSNS indicate abundant social networks [ 46 ]. However, since we aimed to ensure statistical power and for ease in interpretation of the results, we used continuous data divided into median or tertile [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we only focused on supportive relationships because a previous study revealed no significant association between aversive relationships and sleep quality [ 20 ]. Generally, the LSNS cut-off is used for social isolation with less than 12 points [ 27 ], and high scores on the LSNS indicate abundant social networks [ 46 ]. However, since we aimed to ensure statistical power and for ease in interpretation of the results, we used continuous data divided into median or tertile [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some included studies categorised levels of social isolation referring to concepts such as 'social support' or 'social connectedness' [34,50], which may not be reliable indicators of social isolation [55] demonstrating lack of conceptual clarity around these terms. While the above stated instruments are validated measures [56][57][58][59], we also found many studies that used study specific single item questions to identify people experiencing loneliness. While it is problematic to use non-validated measures, it is also known that such direct measurement techniques, generally result in underreporting of loneliness due to the associated social stigma attached to loneliness [60].…”
Section: Different Measurement Tools Used To Assess Loneliness/social...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Social isolation was defined as a LSNS-6 score < 12, in accordance with Lubben et al [ 44 ]. The LSNS-6 has been shown to have good internal consistency across samples of community-dwelling older adults [ 44 46 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%