2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-1034-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of temperate and tropical rainforest tree species: photosynthetic responses to growth temperature

Abstract: Little is known about the differences in physiology between temperate and tropical trees. Australian rainforests extend from tropical climates in the north to temperate climates in the south over a span of 33° latitude. Therefore, they provide an opportunity to investigate differences in the physiology of temperate and tropical trees within the same vegetation type. This study investigated how the response of net photosynthesis to growth temperature differed between Australian temperate and tropical rainforest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

13
132
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
13
132
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Growth temperature-dependent changes in optimum photosynthetic temperature were greater in plants native to desert habitats than in plants native to coastal habitats (Bjö rkman et al, 1975;Pearcy, 1977;Mooney et al, 1978) and were greater in temperate evergreen species than in tropical evergreen species (Hill et al, 1988;Read, 1990;Cunningham and Read, 2002). They suggested that these differences in the phenotypic plasticity were attributed to the extent of the daily and seasonal temperature variations.…”
Section: Discussion Interspecific Variation In Temperature Acclimatiomentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Growth temperature-dependent changes in optimum photosynthetic temperature were greater in plants native to desert habitats than in plants native to coastal habitats (Bjö rkman et al, 1975;Pearcy, 1977;Mooney et al, 1978) and were greater in temperate evergreen species than in tropical evergreen species (Hill et al, 1988;Read, 1990;Cunningham and Read, 2002). They suggested that these differences in the phenotypic plasticity were attributed to the extent of the daily and seasonal temperature variations.…”
Section: Discussion Interspecific Variation In Temperature Acclimatiomentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Plants native to low-temperature environments and those grown at low temperatures generally exhibit higher photosynthetic rates at low temperatures and lower optimum temperatures, compared with plants native to high-temperature environments and those grown at high temperatures (Mooney and Billings, 1961;Slatyer, 1977;Berry and Bjö rkman, 1980;Sage, 2002;Salvucci and Crafts-Brandner, 2004b). For example, the optimum temperature for photosynthesis differs between temperate evergreen species and tropical evergreen species (Hill et al, 1988;Read, 1990;Cunningham and Read, 2002). Such differences have been observed even among ecotypes of the same species (Bjö rkman et al, 1975;Pearcy, 1977;Slatyer, 1977).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taxa can be adapted to their different thermal origins and thus differ in T opt when they grow in a common environment (Berry and Björkman 1980;Cunningham and Read 2002;Gunderson et al 2010). However, it is not clear whether they would still show differences in T opt even when co-occurring, since strong ecotypic adaptation to the common environment might erase any species-scaled differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that species or ecotypes growing in colder environment often but not always have lower photosynthetic temperature optima (T opt ) than those growing at higher temperatures (Björkman et al 1972;Fryer and Ledig 1972;Slatyer 1977;Berry and Björkman 1980;Cavieres et al 2000;Cunningham and Read 2002;Gunderson et al 2010). Taxa can be adapted to their different thermal origins and thus differ in T opt when they grow in a common environment (Berry and Björkman 1980;Cunningham and Read 2002;Gunderson et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%