2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-020-03894-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of TEC from IRI-2016 and GPS during the low solar activity over Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[13] [14] reported that these equinoctial asymmetries present at low latitude are influenced by the thermosphere and ionospheric dynamics processes and meridional wind control as well. Also, we can see that during Previous reports by [15] and [10] showed IRI-2016 model tends to underestimate VTEC at low latitude. due to the presence of equatorial ionospheric anomaly.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[13] [14] reported that these equinoctial asymmetries present at low latitude are influenced by the thermosphere and ionospheric dynamics processes and meridional wind control as well. Also, we can see that during Previous reports by [15] and [10] showed IRI-2016 model tends to underestimate VTEC at low latitude. due to the presence of equatorial ionospheric anomaly.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The level of TEC values is quite good in middle latitudes but not for low latitudes. However, the latest report by [10] and [11] regarding the response of the IRI-2016 TEC model at the maximum and minimum solar activities showed the TEC level at low latitudes tends to be lower than the observation data. In this paper, the TEC from GISTM (GPS Ionospheric Scintillation and TEC Monitoring) installed at Pontianak (0.03 o S;109.33 o E) was used for validation and evaluation IRI-2016 TEC model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The monitoring of solar activity and geomagnetic storms is very important in earthquake precursory study to distinguish the earthquake induced anomaly from geomagnetic storm. There are several reports about the association of TEC anomalies with geomagnetic storms (e.g., Shah et al, 2020a;Shah et al, 2020b;Shah et al, 2020c;Tariq et al, 2020). We observed ionospheric anomaly at Iqqe and Antc stations on December 21, 2016 (4 days before main shock) against Kp>3 geomagnetic storm and anomalous TEC value at Sant station occurred on December 18, 2016 (Figure 3c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Such empirical models are recognized for predicting/modelling the values of ionospheric TEC during several solar magnetic active phases (Timoçin et al, 2018). The analysis of TEC variability of the ionosphere in solar quiet and active days is beneficial and shows a significant practicality in single frequency receiver based navigation using satellites and for the range error corrections and time delay (Tariq et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been reported about model predicted VTEC and measured VTEC over different latitudes to validate improvements in delay over low and mid-latitude (Chakraborty et al, 2014;Tariku, 2016;Natali & Meza, 2017;Tariq et al, 2020). In mid-latitude, IRI models provide fine observations (Kumar et al 2015;Gordiyenko & Yakovets, 2017;Tariku, 2019;Shahzad et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%