2005 IEEE International Workshop on Visual Surveillance and Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance
DOI: 10.1109/vspets.2005.1570905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Target Detection Algorithms using Adaptive Background Models

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
6

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
44
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We notice that the color appearance is very different according to the real scene illumination conditions. For each video sequence, the silhouette of the moving person is extracted by using the background subtraction technique, combined with a shadow elimination algorithm [11,12] and morphological operators (erosion and dilation). A set of key frames in which people are entirely viewed is then extracted in order to characterize the passage of an individual.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We notice that the color appearance is very different according to the real scene illumination conditions. For each video sequence, the silhouette of the moving person is extracted by using the background subtraction technique, combined with a shadow elimination algorithm [11,12] and morphological operators (erosion and dilation). A set of key frames in which people are entirely viewed is then extracted in order to characterize the passage of an individual.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, a detection of moving areas, by background subtraction, combined with a shadow elimination algorithm is first carried out [11,12]. Let us assume now that each person's silhouette is located in all the frames of a video sequence.…”
Section: Signature Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is no agreement on the metrics. With no other objective in mind than giving an order of magnitude of current published results [13], the sensitivity of detection algorithms is less than 50%, using a different metric based on the number of boxes having a sufficient overlap with the ground truth. We believe that this metric is less accurate than the one we have used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Target detection is achieved by considering a background image periodically refreshed throughout the process (Hall et al, 2005). The time interval between two background images is set to 3 minutes but can be chosen by the operator.…”
Section: Motion Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%