1998
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.36.11.3366-3368.1998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Systems for Identification and Differentiation of Species within the Genus Yersinia

Abstract: Of four tested identification systems (API 20E, API Rapid 32 IDE, Micronaut E, and the PCR-based Yersinia enterocoliticaAmplification Set), API 20E is still the system of choice for identifying pathogenic Yersinia isolates. It provides the highest sensitivity both at the genus and at the species level and has the best cost-effectiveness correlation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yersinia spp. provoke false or doubtful identi¢cation in most commercial biochemical identi¢ca-tion systems [26]. Conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for detecting Y. pestis have been developed [7,16,24,27,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yersinia spp. provoke false or doubtful identi¢cation in most commercial biochemical identi¢ca-tion systems [26]. Conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for detecting Y. pestis have been developed [7,16,24,27,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that failure to detect Y. enterocolitica-like strains involved in the pathogenesis of human diseases is attributed to their biochemical similarity and to the low number of discriminating features in comparison with the biochemical pro¢les of Y. enterocolitica. Many commercially available identi¢cation systems are unable to identify Y. enterocolitica-like strains to the species level, because [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species identification of these colonies with the API 20E system resulted in seven Aeromonas spp., eight Citrobacter spp., two Enterobacter spp., two Pantoea spp., one Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 14 Serratia spp., 17 Providencia retgeri and one Y. enterocolitica . Until now, the API system is still accepted as the ‘gold standard’ (Izard et al., 1984; Overmann et al., 1985; Neubauer et al., 1998) to which the Yersinia identification kit and the 16S rRNA based PCR assay have to be compared. All identification systems used in this survey identified the Y. enterocolitica strain correctly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%