1995
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1640110404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of symbolic and numerical integration methods for an assumed‐stress hybrid shell element

Abstract: Hybrid shell elements have long been regarded with reserve by the commercial finite element developers despite the high degree of reliability and accuracy associated with such formulations. The fundamental reason is the inherent higher computational cost of the hybrid approach as compared to the displacement‐based formulations. However, a noteworthy factor in favour of hybrid elements is that numerical integration to generate element matrices can entirely be avoided by the use of symbolic integration. In this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Entre los más destacados investigadores en este campo están Zienkiewicz et al (1971), quien presentó una integración semi-analítica para placas y conchas, reportando en su trabajo una disminución del 50% de tiempo computacional, frente a la integración numérica utilizada en esta clase de problemas. Rengarajan et al (1995), presenta una integración analítica con elementos finitos híbridos para análisis de conchas. En este trabajo no se reporta comparaciones de tiempo de cálculo entre integración numérica y analítica, pero el trabajo con elementos finitos híbridos permite eliminar la aparición de la matriz de transformación de coordenadas (Jacobiano) del denominador de las integrales.…”
Section: Antecedentesunclassified
“…Entre los más destacados investigadores en este campo están Zienkiewicz et al (1971), quien presentó una integración semi-analítica para placas y conchas, reportando en su trabajo una disminución del 50% de tiempo computacional, frente a la integración numérica utilizada en esta clase de problemas. Rengarajan et al (1995), presenta una integración analítica con elementos finitos híbridos para análisis de conchas. En este trabajo no se reporta comparaciones de tiempo de cálculo entre integración numérica y analítica, pero el trabajo con elementos finitos híbridos permite eliminar la aparición de la matriz de transformación de coordenadas (Jacobiano) del denominador de las integrales.…”
Section: Antecedentesunclassified
“…Zienkiewicz et al [6] present a semianalytical integration of plates and shells, and report a reduction in CPU time of nearly 50%. Rengarajan et al [7] integrated analytically a hybrid finite element for shell analysis and carried out comparisons between analytical and numerical integration. One of the advantages of hybrid finite elements is that the determinant of the Jacobian matrix does not appear in the denominator of the stiffness matrix expression as it does in conventional displacement-based finite element formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zienkiewicz et al [7] present a semi-analytical integration of plates and shells, and report a reduction in CPU time of nearly 50%. Rengarajan et al [8] analytically integrated a hybrid finite element for shell analysis and carried out comparisons between analytical and numerical integration. One of the advantages of hybrid finite elements is that the determinant of the Jacobian matrix does not appear in the denominator of the stiffness matrix expression as it does in conventional displacement based finite element formulations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%