2009
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181a3c777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Surgical Treatment in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Anterior Dual Rod Versus Posterior Pedicle Fixation Surgery

Abstract: At a minimum of 2-year follow-up, adolescents with Lenke 5C curves demonstrated statistically significantly better curve correction, less loss of correction over time, and shorter hospital stays when treated with a posterior release with pedicle screw instrumented fusion compared with an anterior instrumented fusion with dual rods for similar patient populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0
11

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
72
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of UIV and LIV in Lenke 5C patients has been a subject of debate in the past decade [18,19]. Although rare general algorithms have been proposed for reference, spine surgeons usually select the UIV and LIV prior to surgery based on experiences and preferences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of UIV and LIV in Lenke 5C patients has been a subject of debate in the past decade [18,19]. Although rare general algorithms have been proposed for reference, spine surgeons usually select the UIV and LIV prior to surgery based on experiences and preferences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tis et al [6] noted a mean kyphosis increase of 15°in patients with Risser sign of \1. On the other hand, the sagittal profile of the lumbar spine has been one of the weak points of anterior spinal instrumentation, which has a limited ability to correct lumbar lordosis even with interbody devices [5,7]. To minimize the kyphosing effect, interbody devices or other structural grafts should always be used when instrumenting below the L1 level.…”
Section: Outcomes After Anterior Open Spinal Instrumentation For Aismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geck et al [5] compared the outcomes of anterior dual rod versus posterior pedicle screw instrumentation for 31 matched pairs of patients with Lenke 5C AIS. In terms of major curve correction (84 vs. 67 %), loss of correction (3.4 vs. 9.4 %), ability to correct lumbar lordosis (17°vs.…”
Section: Outcomes After Anterior Open Spinal Instrumentation For Aismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The risk factors for coronal decompensation have been described thoroughly in the literature [22,[32][33][34], including improper selection of the distal fusion level [32] and the instrumentation pattern [34], hypercorrection of the main curve [22], use of over distraction [34], great growth potentiality [32], and so on. However, most of the risk factors were identified for King 2 curve (Lenke 1C, Lenke 3); risk factors for decompensation in patients with main TL/L curve are poorly documented.…”
Section: Pelvic Axial Rotation (Par)mentioning
confidence: 99%