2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of sulfate-reducing and conventional Anammox upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For simplification, one population group is applied to represent SOB, which are capable of using oxygen, nitrite, or nitrate as electron acceptor, with electrons derived from oxidation of either sulfide or elemental sulfur. The possible pathway of sulfate reduction by Anammox bacteria is not included, in view of its relatively slow rate compared to the dominant conventional metabolisms of Anammox bacteria 42 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplification, one population group is applied to represent SOB, which are capable of using oxygen, nitrite, or nitrate as electron acceptor, with electrons derived from oxidation of either sulfide or elemental sulfur. The possible pathway of sulfate reduction by Anammox bacteria is not included, in view of its relatively slow rate compared to the dominant conventional metabolisms of Anammox bacteria 42 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 Moreover, generally, conventional biological N removal is used for treating wastewaters with relatively low N concentrations (total N concentration less than 100 mg N L -1 ). 14 Several recent studies have shifted the focus to new biological nutrient removal processes, including single reactor system for high ammonia removal over nitrite (SHARON), anaerobic ammonium oxidation (ANAMMOX) 44,45 and completely autographic N removal over nitrite (CANON) systems. 11 These new processes are based on the partial nitrification of ammonium into nitrite combined with the anaerobic oxidation of ammonium.…”
Section: Biological N Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR-DGGE uses a GC-clamp primer (GC-clamp added to the 5´terminus of the forward primer) for amplification prior to gel electrophoresis. DGGE was used in previous studies of anammox samples (i) to detect key microorganisms that contributed to the loss of ammonium and nitrite in batch assay [64], (ii) to analyse bacterial population in the biofilm of the UASB reactor [39] and (iii) to study the microbial population in the anammox reactor [65]. DGGE has been commonly chosen to define phylogenetic relationships among bacteria because the technique can supply precise and abundant information concerning genetic diversity by separating different base-pair sequences (approximately 200-700 base pairs) [66].…”
Section: Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (Dgge)mentioning
confidence: 99%