2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of steel, aluminum and composite bonnet in terms of pedestrian head impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, this research in line with Masoumi [5] reported aluminum bonnet has more displacement than steel. This means that aluminum has better crashworthiness regarding to its light weight.…”
Section: Deformation Of Outer Hood Panelsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, this research in line with Masoumi [5] reported aluminum bonnet has more displacement than steel. This means that aluminum has better crashworthiness regarding to its light weight.…”
Section: Deformation Of Outer Hood Panelsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Otherwise, more harder material of outer hood panel can increase the number of HIC values. Masoumi et al [5] had investigated comparison between engine hood made of composite material, steel and aluminiumin terms of material cost, manufacturing cost, maximum displacement, HIC valuesand weight. They found that the composite materials have higher material and manufacturing costs thansteel and aluminum and maximum displacement, lower HIC, and weighter than aluminum and steel.…”
Section: Equivalent (Von-misses) Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Elements associated with crash protection have to be compelled to transmit or absorb power. Carley ME et.al [8] observes is to layout inexperienced epoxy structural foam reinforcements to boost the energy absorption of the front and rear automotive bumper beams. 3 bumper structural overall performance criteria had been studied.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masoumi A et.al [11] in their thesis describes the design of a new frontal vehicle structure that directs the asymmetric crash load of an offset collision as an axial load to the second unloaded longitudinal member. Only by using both longitudinal members and through a progressive folding pattern, enough energy can be absorbed in the front structure to prevent a deformation of the passenger compartment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%