2009
DOI: 10.1177/145749690909800411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Standard Anteroposterior Knee and Hip-to-Ankle Radiographs in Determining the Lower Limb and Implant Alignment after Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract: Background and Aims: the coronal alignment of the lower limb is important for planning and assessing outcome after total knee arthroplasty.this study compared postoperative estimation of alignment and measurement of angles using both hip-to-ankle radiographs and anteroposterior (ap) knee radiographs in standing position.Patients and Methods: Consecutive standard ap knee and hip-to-ankle radiographs in 83 patients (103 knees) after total knee arthroplasty were analyzed.Results: the tibiofemoral angle measured f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
60
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(4 reference statements)
2
60
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we used only one conventional instrumentation system (Genesis II) and only one navigation system (Orthopilot), and different systems of standard instrument or navigation may produce different findings. Third, we used standing whole-limb AP radiographs for radiographic measurements, and although this radiographic view is known to have satisfactory accuracy and reliability [5,35] and have been frequently used in previous studies with similar purposes [11,26,29,30,36,40], it may be affected by several factors such as degree of rotation. To maintain the quality of radiographic images, we used a specially designed template to control rotation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we used only one conventional instrumentation system (Genesis II) and only one navigation system (Orthopilot), and different systems of standard instrument or navigation may produce different findings. Third, we used standing whole-limb AP radiographs for radiographic measurements, and although this radiographic view is known to have satisfactory accuracy and reliability [5,35] and have been frequently used in previous studies with similar purposes [11,26,29,30,36,40], it may be affected by several factors such as degree of rotation. To maintain the quality of radiographic images, we used a specially designed template to control rotation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the gold standard for assessing the mechanical axis is by using standing radiographs of the entire lower limb (long plate) [33]. The correct acquisition of such images may be difficult, especially in patients qualified for knee arthroplasty, as pain and limitation of motion of the affected joint both before and after surgery may make it difficult to assume an appropriate position for the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of the camera was always parallel to the floor. As mentioned by Skyttä et al [27], special attention was paid to obtain a true AP projection because even a slight rotation or flexion of the knees can cause distortion of the alignment measurement. The entire leg from the hip to the ankle was visible on the radiograph.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%