2018
DOI: 10.4317/jced.532741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of spring characteristics of titanium-molybdenum alloy and stainless steel

Abstract: Spring characteristics of orthodontic wires e84

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current orthodontic practice, 0.017 × 0.025-inch SS, 0.019 × 0.025-inch SS, and 0.21 × 0.025 TMA AWs are used for COS leveling during orthodontic treatment. The reported stiffness values for 0.019 × 0.025-inch SS AW are higher than 0.021 × 0.025-inch-TMA AW which means the amount of the delivered force when using 0.19 × 0.025-inch SS is higher [26]. On the other hand, while TMA AW generates gentle forces and delivers approximately half the force of SS AW [27], 0.021 × 0.025-inch TMA AW has less AW/bracket-slot play (due to increased AW dimension) and has higher frictional resistance compared to SS AWs [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the current orthodontic practice, 0.017 × 0.025-inch SS, 0.019 × 0.025-inch SS, and 0.21 × 0.025 TMA AWs are used for COS leveling during orthodontic treatment. The reported stiffness values for 0.019 × 0.025-inch SS AW are higher than 0.021 × 0.025-inch-TMA AW which means the amount of the delivered force when using 0.19 × 0.025-inch SS is higher [26]. On the other hand, while TMA AW generates gentle forces and delivers approximately half the force of SS AW [27], 0.021 × 0.025-inch TMA AW has less AW/bracket-slot play (due to increased AW dimension) and has higher frictional resistance compared to SS AWs [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%