1986
DOI: 10.2307/3801507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Some Statistical Techniques for Analysis of Resource Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
111
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
111
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Data were pooled to maintain sufficient sample size, unless otherwise noted (Alldredge and Ratti 1986;Thomas and Taylor 1990). Home range sizes were compared between years using the Mann-Whitney Utest.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were pooled to maintain sufficient sample size, unless otherwise noted (Alldredge and Ratti 1986;Thomas and Taylor 1990). Home range sizes were compared between years using the Mann-Whitney Utest.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neu's test (similar to Friedman's test) examines non-independent variables such as preferences and avoidances, and gives the lowest Type II error rates based on our experimental design (Alldredge & Ratti 1986, 1992. To examine differences in preference or avoidance of an alga among locations, we calculated and compared proportional selectivity indices (see next subsection).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this analysis, the use of the river and streams was considered simultaneously, to avoid the problem of dependence when the proportional use of a habitat type is treated separately (Aebischer and Robertson 1992). Chi-square analysis was used to test for goodness-of-fit (Neu et al 1974, Alldredge andRatti 1986).…”
Section: Radio-trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%