2008 Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems 2008
DOI: 10.1109/haptics.2008.4479916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Skin Stretch and Vibrotactile Stimulation for Feedback of Proprioceptive Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They showed that stimulation of amputee nerve stumps with intrafascicular electrodes could be used to provide feedback information about both grip strength and limb position. Bark et al [1] developed a device for stretching the skin of the arm, and they found that skin stretch was a more effective modality than vibration in providing artificial proprioceptive feedback.…”
Section: Proprioceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that stimulation of amputee nerve stumps with intrafascicular electrodes could be used to provide feedback information about both grip strength and limb position. Bark et al [1] developed a device for stretching the skin of the arm, and they found that skin stretch was a more effective modality than vibration in providing artificial proprioceptive feedback.…”
Section: Proprioceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies of haptic feedback intended for lower limb amputees include use of pneumatic balloon [7] and vibration [8] - [9] to exert feedback on the skin in response to gait events identified using force sensors worn at foot. Although vibrotactile stimuli find its way in many haptic applications, skin stretch modality has been suggested as having advantages to vibration as it activates multiple types of mechanoreceptors and does not show the adaptation effect demonstrated by vibrotactile actuators [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include sensory substitution with cutaneous electrical stimulation [63], vibration on the skin surface [65][66][67][68], skin stretch [69,70] and tendon vibration [71,72] for proprioception, and targeted sensory reinnervation [12,73,74]. In laboratory settings, these have been successful, but none have been sufficiently robust or effective in everyday use for widespread adoption in commercially available prosthetics.…”
Section: Neural Interfaces Are Needed To Restore Somatosensationmentioning
confidence: 99%