2017 IEEE 13th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/wimob.2017.8115821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of similarity approaches for indoor localization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to improved localization and reduced computational complexity, as concluded by Amr et al [ 19 ]. A detailed comparison of technologies and algorithms implementing the fingerprint technique for IoT indoor positioning has been carried out by [ 15 , 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to improved localization and reduced computational complexity, as concluded by Amr et al [ 19 ]. A detailed comparison of technologies and algorithms implementing the fingerprint technique for IoT indoor positioning has been carried out by [ 15 , 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indoor positioning systems (IPSs) have received significant attention in both academia and industry due to the growth of wireless communication infrastructure and the ever-increasing demand for location-based services (LBSs) [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]. Currently, more than 80% of the world’s population owns a smartphone [ 5 ], it is estimated that most people spend around 80% of their daily lives indoors [ 6 ], and 74% of smart device owners are active users of smartphone location-based applications [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its simplicity, RSSI is the most commonly used parameter in indoor localization, as it does not require additional hardware for time or phase synchronization and can be easily acquired. The existing methods based on RSSI can be classified into two categories; solutions based on fingerprinting [7], [8] and others based on trilateration [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%