2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of SIF solutions obtained by XFEM and conventional FEM for cracks in complex geometries like valve body

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The XFEM method, birthed from unit decomposition theory, is a computational technique that incorporates discontinuous shape functions to tackle fracture element discontinuity in fracture processes. In the context of crack propagation calculation, the XFEM method first calculates the stress field close to the crack tip through the crack tip's displacement field; then, leveraging J-integral theory, it determines the crack tip's stress intensity factor based on the calculated stress field results [32]. Typically, the standard XFEM displacement approximation calculation function can be expressed as follows:…”
Section: Principle Of Extended Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The XFEM method, birthed from unit decomposition theory, is a computational technique that incorporates discontinuous shape functions to tackle fracture element discontinuity in fracture processes. In the context of crack propagation calculation, the XFEM method first calculates the stress field close to the crack tip through the crack tip's displacement field; then, leveraging J-integral theory, it determines the crack tip's stress intensity factor based on the calculated stress field results [32]. Typically, the standard XFEM displacement approximation calculation function can be expressed as follows:…”
Section: Principle Of Extended Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extended finite element method serves as an accurate and easier method to evaluate SIF. Comparison of SIF solutions obtained by XFEM and conventional FEM for cracks in complex geometries like valve body and found that XFEM is accurate in evaluating SIF 4 . The size of the mesh affects the accuracy of the SIF evaluation in commercial finite element software 5 .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Numerical modelling based on the extended finite element method (XFEM) by linear analysis (that is widely used in the process of fracture and crack growth) is used to obtain the results. However, this modelling approach has limitations in that it incurs a high computational cost and it is difficult to achieve convergence in some scenarios [23]. This approach incorporates certain degrees of freedom of the nodes that 5.…”
Section: Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%