2012
DOI: 10.3109/09593985.2012.699606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of shoulder resultant net moment between three different exercises and load conditions

Abstract: Different exercises are prescribed by physiotherapists and despite the popular use of elastic resistance, few studies have investigated the effect of such rehabilitation tools on shoulder resultant net moment (RNM). The aim of the present study was to compare shoulder RNM peak values and the respective angle of occurrence during three shoulder rehabilitation exercises: 1) elevation in the scapular plane; 2) flexion; and 3) abduction when performed in three different load situations: 1) without external load; 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cases, resistance provided by a 60cm gray elastic band (Theraband) was used, with the strain previously calculated by the researchers through a literature calibration procedure 21 . The subject had to reach a maximum resistance of approximately 5% of body weight at the end of their range of motion 26 determined by calibration. After performing the movements, the cables and electrodes were disconnected, the individual's skin was cleaned, and participation in the research ended.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, resistance provided by a 60cm gray elastic band (Theraband) was used, with the strain previously calculated by the researchers through a literature calibration procedure 21 . The subject had to reach a maximum resistance of approximately 5% of body weight at the end of their range of motion 26 determined by calibration. After performing the movements, the cables and electrodes were disconnected, the individual's skin was cleaned, and participation in the research ended.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the shoulder abductors must exert the highest force to hold the arm in the horizontal testing position compared with the forces needed to hold the arm in the intermediate and vertical testing positions. For example, holding the unloaded arm in the horizontal position requires about 10 Nm of torque compared with the 5 Nm of torque at the vertical position [9]. A previous study also reported that subjects overestimated the force needed to move the limb to the target position [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A previous analysis of the range of motion (RoM) and peak torque in the shoulder during external rotation exercises, performed with a cable pulley machine or with a variable resistance machine, found that the RoM and the angle at which the peak joint torque was achieved differed between the two training devices, even though the peak torque values did not differ significantly [ 16 ]. Furthermore, the resultant peak moments occurred at different angles when the exercises were performed with ER compared to when the same exercises were performed either without external load or with CR achieved through the use of dumbbells [ 17 ]. Moreover, the resultant peak moments during exercises performed with ER appeared to be smaller than those achieved when exercising with dumbbells [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the resultant peak moments occurred at different angles when the exercises were performed with ER compared to when the same exercises were performed either without external load or with CR achieved through the use of dumbbells [ 17 ]. Moreover, the resultant peak moments during exercises performed with ER appeared to be smaller than those achieved when exercising with dumbbells [ 17 ]. Importantly, most previous studies examining kinetics or kinematics of the shoulder have investigated exercises other than internal or external rotation [ 17 20 ], and no studies have compared the three-dimensional (3D) shoulder kinetics and kinematics during internal and external rotation exercises performed with CR or with ER.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%