2001
DOI: 10.1002/nme.206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of several numerical methods for mechanical systems with impacts

Abstract: International audienceThe modellization of mechanical systems with non-linearities of impact type leads to discontinuities in the velocity. In this paper, we study some numerical methods adapted to the occurrence of such discontinuities from a single-degree-of-freedom vibro-impact system. Theoretical results of consistency are given for numerical methods valid for smooth ordinary differential equations, with several kinds of procedures for approximating impact times. The algorithms are applied to classical New… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the primary system attains smaller displacement amplitude than that in the situation without impacts. For the modeling of impact damper on a vibratory system, it is necessary to derive lot of formulas for the steady-state response with two symmetric impacts per cycle or arbitrary number of impacts under sinusoidal excitation (Barbara, 2001;Janin and Lamarque, 2001;Yao et al, 2005). At present, most of the dynamic characteristic investigations of impact dampers assume that the impact condition between the impact damper and the primary system is governed by the coefficient of restitution, which results in discontinuity in the phase plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the primary system attains smaller displacement amplitude than that in the situation without impacts. For the modeling of impact damper on a vibratory system, it is necessary to derive lot of formulas for the steady-state response with two symmetric impacts per cycle or arbitrary number of impacts under sinusoidal excitation (Barbara, 2001;Janin and Lamarque, 2001;Yao et al, 2005). At present, most of the dynamic characteristic investigations of impact dampers assume that the impact condition between the impact damper and the primary system is governed by the coefficient of restitution, which results in discontinuity in the phase plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a quick aside, let us briefly comment on the affects of the aforementioned partial timestepping and root finding on the accuracy of event‐driven simulations. In , it is proven, for the specific case of an oscillator subject to a linear unilateral constraint, that the root finding to determine a collision time τ must be at least O ( h 4 ) to preserve the fourth‐order accuracy of a given discrete flow map when handling the nonsmooth case. Analysis of our more general nonsmooth systems, in which the unilateral constraint is a nonlinear function ϕ ( q ), is significantly more complex.…”
Section: Structured Integration Methods For Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first developments have been pioneered by Jean and Moreau, see e.g. (Jean, 1999;Jean and Moreau, 1987), continued by numerous investigations (Doyen et al, 2011;Janin and Lamarque, 2001;Paoli and Schatzman, 2002), and are now summarized in reference books (Acary and Brogliato, 2008;Studer, 2009). Nonsmooth methods have been succesfully applied in a variety of contexts ranging from granular media (Renouf et al, 2004), geomaterials (Jean, 1995), multibody dynamics (Chen et al, 2013) to realistic simulations of hair motions and living systems (Acary et al, 2014;Bertails-Descoubes et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%