2017
DOI: 10.1080/08997659.2016.1274690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Selected Nonlethal Samples from Adult Steelhead for Detection of Infectious Hematopoietic Necrosis Virus Using Cell Culture

Abstract: Nonlethal sampling techniques have previously been evaluated for detection of a variety of viral salmonid pathogens. However, many of these studies have used molecular assays in lieu of widely accepted cell culture techniques to evaluate the sampled tissues. Samples were collected from female steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss broodstock using three potential nonlethal sampling methods (mucus/skin scrape, pectoral fin clip, and gill tissue biopsy) and evaluated for the presence of infectious hematopoietic necrosis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of logistical constraints regarding nonlethal tissue sampling (e.g., the invasiveness of procedures) has been characterized for single agent assessments, with the benefits of some less invasive techniques (e.g., fin clipping) providing insufficient information on host health and infection development (Burbank et al. ). In this study, the processing of blood was more time‐consuming than of gills, taking into account the dilution process to avoid downstream issues with protein contamination in purified RNA as well as troubleshooting the clotting issues following the thawing of samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of logistical constraints regarding nonlethal tissue sampling (e.g., the invasiveness of procedures) has been characterized for single agent assessments, with the benefits of some less invasive techniques (e.g., fin clipping) providing insufficient information on host health and infection development (Burbank et al. ). In this study, the processing of blood was more time‐consuming than of gills, taking into account the dilution process to avoid downstream issues with protein contamination in purified RNA as well as troubleshooting the clotting issues following the thawing of samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Burbank, Fehringer & Chiaramonte (2017) reported a non-lethal sampling technique through fin clipping in adult steelhead trout, followed by the detection of IHNV with cell culture techniques. This method has been demonstrated to be more efficient than the standard lethal sampling methods, such as spleen and anterior kidney sampling (Burbank, Fehringer & Chiaramonte, 2017).…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Ihnvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Burbank, Fehringer & Chiaramonte (2017) reported a non-lethal sampling technique through fin clipping in adult steelhead trout, followed by the detection of IHNV with cell culture techniques. This method has been demonstrated to be more efficient than the standard lethal sampling methods, such as spleen and anterior kidney sampling (Burbank, Fehringer & Chiaramonte, 2017). The confirmation test or “gold standard” for IHNV diagnosis is by detecting the virus in cell cultures, followed by diagnosis using immunological and molecular techniques (Barlič-Maganja et al, 2002; Burbank, Fehringer & Chiaramonte, 2017; Crane & Williams, 2008; Winton, 1991; Woo, Leatherland & Bruno, 2011).…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Ihnvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Burbank et al (2017) reported a non-lethal sampling technique through fin clipping in adult steelhead trout, followed by the detection of IHNV with cell culture techniques.…”
Section: Clinical Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been demonstrated to be more efficient that the standard lethal sampling methods, such as spleen and anterior kidney sampling (Burbank et al 2017). The confirmation test or 'gold standard' for IHNV diagnosis is by detecting the virus in cell cultures, followed by diagnosis using immunological and molecular techniques (Barlič-Maganja et al 2002;Burbank et al 2017;Crane 2008;Winton 1991;Woo et al 2011). The presence of IHNV is routinely assessed by observing the development of viral cytopathic effect (CPE) in cell lines such as epithelioma papulosum cyprinid (EPC) and fathead minnow (FHM) under a phase-contrast microscope (Dixon et al 2016).…”
Section: Clinical Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%