2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of second-generation processes for the conversion of sugarcane bagasse to liquid biofuels in terms of energy efficiency, pinch point analysis and Life Cycle Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scenario 2 exhibited a significantly higher yield compared to Scenario 1 (493 kg of LA per tonne of DM vs. 260 kg of EtOH per tonne of DM). This result could be ascribed to conversion of all sugars (glucose and xylose) to LA with 95% of the maximum theoretical conversion, whereas in Scenario 1 the glucose and xylose are respectively converted to EtOH at 90.5% and 76.6% of the theoretical maximum . Furthermore, LA is produced via the bacterial homofermentative pathway with the production of a single fermentation product, with theoretical maximum yield of 1:1 which is higher than that of EtOH (0.51:1) due to CO 2 co‐production.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scenario 2 exhibited a significantly higher yield compared to Scenario 1 (493 kg of LA per tonne of DM vs. 260 kg of EtOH per tonne of DM). This result could be ascribed to conversion of all sugars (glucose and xylose) to LA with 95% of the maximum theoretical conversion, whereas in Scenario 1 the glucose and xylose are respectively converted to EtOH at 90.5% and 76.6% of the theoretical maximum . Furthermore, LA is produced via the bacterial homofermentative pathway with the production of a single fermentation product, with theoretical maximum yield of 1:1 which is higher than that of EtOH (0.51:1) due to CO 2 co‐production.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technically challenging methods for producing biofuels from lower‐value lignocellulose materials, such as agricultural residues, are classified as second‐generation techniques . Substantial amounts of electricity can be generated together with first‐ and second‐generation biofuel production methods, to improve the economic viability of the process, and further reduce the effects of global warming by substituting electricity that would otherwise have been produced from fossil fuels . The sugarcane crop has been identified as one of the primary sources for ethanol production in sub‐Saharan Africa, as it provides feedstock for both first‐ and second‐generation ethanol and electricity co‐producion …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, a policy support for biofuels is justified [15]. Changes in the legal framework had direct impacts on their development [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%