2016 IEEE 1er Congreso Nacional De Ciencias Geoespaciales (CNCG) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cncg.2016.7985078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of satellite-derived potential evapotranspiration (MOD16A3) with in situ measurements from quintana roo, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discrepancies have been found when comparing the classification of land use by the MODIS product with that made in the field [49], in contrast with this study, in which the classifications coincide both for shrublands in EC3, EC4, and EC5 and for crops in EC1 and EC2; however, MOD16 considers constant the properties for the same biome, so the phenological and structural differences of the shrubs are not captured, having an impact on the ET estimates. It has been found that when comparing MOD16 to estimates of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) in southeastern Mexico, in areas of higher humidity, there is a 0.21 coefficient of correlation, suggesting that it is necessary to parameterize the algorithm with locally derived data [50]; even though higher correlations were found in this study, it is necessary to obtain local phenology measurements, associate them with the national land cover classification, and then integrate them in MOD16.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Discrepancies have been found when comparing the classification of land use by the MODIS product with that made in the field [49], in contrast with this study, in which the classifications coincide both for shrublands in EC3, EC4, and EC5 and for crops in EC1 and EC2; however, MOD16 considers constant the properties for the same biome, so the phenological and structural differences of the shrubs are not captured, having an impact on the ET estimates. It has been found that when comparing MOD16 to estimates of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) in southeastern Mexico, in areas of higher humidity, there is a 0.21 coefficient of correlation, suggesting that it is necessary to parameterize the algorithm with locally derived data [50]; even though higher correlations were found in this study, it is necessary to obtain local phenology measurements, associate them with the national land cover classification, and then integrate them in MOD16.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The performance of the MOD16 estimation model has been validated in different ecosystems of the USA [3,43], and this model attracted interest for its use in other regions of the world [7,[44][45][46][47][48][49]. However, in Mexico it has been little explored, except for some evaluations of the potential ET product in concrete areas [50]. Therefore, the main objective of this research was to evaluate MOD16 by comparing its estimations with measurements of ET through eddy covariance (EC), to assess the possibility of using MOD16 for decision-making in questions related to the hydrological cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%