2012
DOI: 10.5604/.1024710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Sarcomere Length Two Types of Meat From Animal Family Suidae – Analysis of Measurements Carried Out by Microscopic Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, significant quadratic correlations had been found between the length of sarcomere and the level of dietary FPH as well as between the length of I‐band and the level of dietary FPH, which indicated that an appropriate level of FPH may increase the length of sarcomere by increasing the length of I‐band. In addition, some researches showed that the change of muscle microstructure (FD) and ultrastructure (sarcomere length) could impact fish muscle's textural parameters (Guzek et al., 2012; Johnston et al., 2000). However, all textural parameters of muscle determined with a texturometer in our study had no significant differences among treatments and no significant linear or quadratic correlation between textural parameters and dietary FPH level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, significant quadratic correlations had been found between the length of sarcomere and the level of dietary FPH as well as between the length of I‐band and the level of dietary FPH, which indicated that an appropriate level of FPH may increase the length of sarcomere by increasing the length of I‐band. In addition, some researches showed that the change of muscle microstructure (FD) and ultrastructure (sarcomere length) could impact fish muscle's textural parameters (Guzek et al., 2012; Johnston et al., 2000). However, all textural parameters of muscle determined with a texturometer in our study had no significant differences among treatments and no significant linear or quadratic correlation between textural parameters and dietary FPH level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarcomere length was measured according to the method of Cross et al (1981) with some modifications (quantity of myofibrils and sarcomeres measured was modified to allow obtaining representative results), as published previously ( Guzek et al, 2012 ). For each cut, representative 5 g meat samples were collected and microscopic preparations were obtained from a sucrose solution - samples were homogenized in 30 ml of cold 0.25 M sucrose at low speed (mechanical homogeniser PRO 200, PRO Scientific Inc., Connecticut, USA – 5,000 rpm, 60 seconds).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarcomere length was measured according to the method of Cross et al (1981) with minor modifi cations (Guzek et al 2012a(Guzek et al , 2015. In the case of each cut, representative 5 g meat samples were collected and homogenized in 30 ml of cold 0.25 M sucrose solution at low speed (mechanical homogenizer PRO 200, PRO Scientific Inc., Connecticut, USA -5000 rpm, 60 seconds).…”
Section: Sarcomere Length Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%