2017
DOI: 10.12816/0046226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Reverse Transcription - PCR and Viral Culture for Detection of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Young Children : Relation to Epidemiological and Clinical Findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 However, both the sexes were equally infected with RSV in our study. Similar observations were made by Fall et al 21 and Koetz et al 23 Zahlan et al 18 and Liu et al 24 documented male dominance in their study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…22 However, both the sexes were equally infected with RSV in our study. Similar observations were made by Fall et al 21 and Koetz et al 23 Zahlan et al 18 and Liu et al 24 documented male dominance in their study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…nRT-PCR was shown to detect significantly more numbers of RSV than tissue culture in a previous study. 18 In India, studies by Nandhini et al 29 and Agrawal et al 12 reported that performance of real time RT-PCR in detecting RSV was greater than that of conventional RT-PCR, supporting the findings of our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Re infection in RSV and hMPV happens with comparable strains in spite of normal infection stimulating high levels of antibody against conserved antigens [11]. The diagnosis of RSV and hMPV infections can be made by several techniques, including culture, nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT), antigen detection and serology test, but detection of viral RNA by NAAT such as reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) assay is the most sensitive method for diagnosis of RSV and hMPV infections [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, evaluation of the performance of RSV diagnostics has relied on the use of imperfect reference tests 15 18 that may introduce bias to the accuracy estimates of index tests. Further, a call for alternative evaluation approaches is justified especially when interest lies in demonstrating the superiority of a novel tests over an existing reference standard 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%