2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2011.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of rates of ureolysis between Sporosarcina pasteurii and an indigenous groundwater community under conditions required to precipitate large volumes of calcite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
144
9
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
144
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Biostimulation, in contrast, encourages the growth of a particular guild of native soil microfauna through the manipulation of specific growth conditions. However, a possible drawback of this method is that the initial soil concentration of ureolytic bacteria might limit the rate of ureolytic MICP in the site to be treated (Tobler et al, 2011). Another consideration affecting biostimulation is the cellular regulation over urease expression.…”
Section: Co(nhmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Biostimulation, in contrast, encourages the growth of a particular guild of native soil microfauna through the manipulation of specific growth conditions. However, a possible drawback of this method is that the initial soil concentration of ureolytic bacteria might limit the rate of ureolytic MICP in the site to be treated (Tobler et al, 2011). Another consideration affecting biostimulation is the cellular regulation over urease expression.…”
Section: Co(nhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some studies of ureolytic MICP have been conducted using mixed bacterial cultures in the lab (De Muynck et al, 2008a;Tobler et al, 2011) and others have been conducted in situ by stimulation of indigenous ureolytic bacteria (Burbank et al, 2011;Fujita et al, 2008), little attention has been paid to the effect on the system of the non-ureolytic bacteria present in the experimental setting. In this study, the potentially conflicting effects of ureolytic and non-ureolytic bacteria on CaCO 3 precipitation were investigated in a simple, two-species batch experiment.…”
Section: Co(nhmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a large macro-pore, and rate of hydrolysis proportional to the urea concentration (e.g. Tobler et al, 2011), the steady-state flux of urea into the soil is approximately (Crank, 1975, Eq. 4.50): where [urea] 0 is the concentration in the macro-pore, D U the urea diffusion coefficient in the soil and k the hydrolysis rate constant.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis B: For Practical Applications In Cylindmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If CaCO 3 precipitates in the zone of pH increase, this will curb the pH rise and thereby reduce the losses of NH 3 . There is currently particular interest in exploiting microbiallyenhanced urea hydrolysis in soils and sub-strata to stimulate CaCO 3 precipitation for various applications such as physical stabilisation of soils (Stocks-Fischer et al, 1999;Chu et al, 2012), capture of heavy metals and radionuclides (Mitchell and Ferris., 2005;Fujita et al, 2010;Tobler et al, 2011), sealing of leaks in CO 2 storage reservoirs (Ferris et al, 1996;Cunningham et al, 2009), and carbon sequestration (Dupraz et al, 2009;Mitchell et al, 2010;Renforth et al, 2009;Whitmore et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%