2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of RAPD, ISSR, and AFLP Molecular Markers to Reveal and Classify Orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) Germplasm Variations

Abstract: Three different DNA-based techniques, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD), Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) and Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) markers, were used for fingerprinting Dactylis glomerata genotypes and for detecting genetic variation between the three different subspecies. In this study, RAPD assays produced 97 bands, of which 40 were polymorphic (41.2%). The ISSR primers amplified 91 bands, and 54 showed polymorphism (59.3%). Finally, the AFLP showed 100 bands, of which 92 we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
1
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
58
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These discrepancies in the GS revealed by the different marker types could be attributed to the different mechanism of detecting the polymorphism and genome coverage by the different markers .Therefore, the GS based on the combined data could be more representative of the genetic relationships. Such findings were previously reported by Qian et al (2001), McGregor et al (2000), Belaj et al (2003) and Costa et al (2016).…”
Section: Genetic Relationships Among Olive Varietiessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These discrepancies in the GS revealed by the different marker types could be attributed to the different mechanism of detecting the polymorphism and genome coverage by the different markers .Therefore, the GS based on the combined data could be more representative of the genetic relationships. Such findings were previously reported by Qian et al (2001), McGregor et al (2000), Belaj et al (2003) and Costa et al (2016).…”
Section: Genetic Relationships Among Olive Varietiessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This may suggest that these markers targeted different genomic areas however other areas were common. Therefore, the analysis of variability may require more than one DNAbased marker (Costa et al, 2016). Given that, our results support that AFLP-based (SASPL and SAMPL) markers had more relative efficiency than other marker systems , similar results were reported in SAMPL (Sarwat et al, 2008) and SSAP (Tam et al, 2005).…”
Section: Comparison Between the In Silico And In Vitro Pcr Analysis Rsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Simpler to use than SSR technique [18]. Molecular fingerprints of four different species of Curcuma amada, C.caesia, C.longa and C.zedoa [19].Similar results are also reported in three different DNA based technique such as RAPD, ISSR and AFLP were used for fingerprinting Dactylis glomerata genotype and for detecting genetic variation between the three subspecies [20]. Various species of genus Saccharina are economically important brown algae cultivated in China.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Because this issue, Velascoramirez et al, (2014) recommended that the information that is generated by various markers had a valuable capacity for genetic studies involving both, diversity and relationships. By this criterion, the combining different marker system was critically better for diversity study as recommended through numerous reports such as (Jhang et al, 2010; Wang et al, 2012;Amar and Abd El Wahab, 2013;Velascoramirez et al, 2014;Costa et al, 2016). In view of the performance of the combined tree and the principal components analysis (PCoA) (Fig 4 and 5), formed groups consistent with the cluster analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%