2017 Sensor Data Fusion: Trends, Solutions, Applications (SDF) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/sdf.2017.8126350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of random forest and long short-term memory network performances in classification tasks using radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(14). As a consequence, the likelihoods are higher for the same detections than in the naive fusion (19). In contrast, the naive fusion reports the lowest probability at the beginning of the tracks.…”
Section: A Existence Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(14). As a consequence, the likelihoods are higher for the same detections than in the naive fusion (19). In contrast, the naive fusion reports the lowest probability at the beginning of the tracks.…”
Section: A Existence Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Several radar based pedestrian detection systems were described in the literature. A radar based multi-class classifier system (including pedestrian and group of pedestrians) was shown in [19]. [7] and [8] both aim to distinguish pedestrians from vehicles using features like size and velocity profiles of the objects using radar.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were compared in a single-class (pedestrian) detection task. [2] also uses clusters calculated by DBSCAN as the base of a multi-class (car, pedestrian, group of pedestrians, cyclist, truck) detection, but extract different features, e.g. deviation and spread of α.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a single reflection does not convey enough information to segment and classify an entire object, many radar based road user detection methods (e.g. [1], [2], [3]) first cluster radar targets by their target-level features. Clusters are then classified as a whole based on derived statistical features (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-level autonomous driving requires understanding of complex scenes. To this end [12] examined the classification of several dynamic object classes using random forests and long short-term memory (LSTM) cells. Both approaches yield good performance, but the class results have a bias towards overproportionally represented classes in the training set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%