2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2018.8500607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radar-based Feature Design and Multiclass Classification for Road User Recognition

Abstract: The classification of individual traffic participants is a complex task, especially for challenging scenarios with multiple road users or under bad weather conditions. Radar sensors provide an -with respect to well established camera systems -orthogonal way of measuring such scenes. In order to gain accurate classification results, 50 different features are extracted from the measurement data and tested on their performance. From these features a suitable subset is chosen and passed to random forest and long s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in [5] and [6], five classes of dynamic road users are recognized and separated from a sixth class comprising measurement artifacts and other undesired data points. This article is based on the work presented in [6]. By applying different kinds of multiclass binarization techniques, the classification performance is improved, there.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in [5] and [6], five classes of dynamic road users are recognized and separated from a sixth class comprising measurement artifacts and other undesired data points. This article is based on the work presented in [6]. By applying different kinds of multiclass binarization techniques, the classification performance is improved, there.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scans from the two sensors are hereby treated as different measurements. These features were previously found to be well-suited characteristics for the classification of VRUs in [1]. The reflected power is compensated for free-space path loss using R 4 correction where R is the range between sensor and detection.…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A human labeler is simply not as accustomed to radar measurements as to image data, for example. One solution to this problem is to find models that require less data to converge, i.e., using classification models with small amount of training coefficients as in [1]. Moreover, techniques such as active learning were found to be able to reduce the required amount of data for radar-based classification tasks [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18] also aims to improve the clustering with a multi-stage approach. [3] follows the work of [2] for clustering and classification, but tests and ranks further cluster-wise features in a backward elimination study.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a single reflection does not convey enough information to segment and classify an entire object, many radar based road user detection methods (e.g. [1], [2], [3]) first cluster radar targets by their target-level features. Clusters are then classified as a whole based on derived statistical features (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%