2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00062-021-01040-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Radiomic Models Based on Different Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Intracerebral Hemorrhage Expansion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the limited number of studies conducted by using ML in prediction models in dentistry, it is difficult to compare our study with the existing studies. Although most ML-based prediction models used in the field of medicine demonstrated improved performance compared to traditional statistical methods [43][44][45], not all showed a higher performance than regression models developed in these studies. For example, Sampa et al [43] developed a blood uric acid prediction model using multiple ML algorithms and reported that the boosted decision tree model showed improved performance compared to the traditional linear regression model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the limited number of studies conducted by using ML in prediction models in dentistry, it is difficult to compare our study with the existing studies. Although most ML-based prediction models used in the field of medicine demonstrated improved performance compared to traditional statistical methods [43][44][45], not all showed a higher performance than regression models developed in these studies. For example, Sampa et al [43] developed a blood uric acid prediction model using multiple ML algorithms and reported that the boosted decision tree model showed improved performance compared to the traditional linear regression model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This shows that not all ML-based prediction models show higher performance than traditional regression models, and the outcome varies based on the variable characteristics, the database used, and disease characteristics to be predicted. Nevertheless, there is no doubt that ML algorithms such as XGBoost and random forest are very powerful classifiers in many cases [43][44][45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KNN is a conceptually simple but powerful algorithm that is easy to use, interpret and implement [28]. It has been widely used in previous studies [29][30][31]. Furthermore, we found that XGBoost had the highest ACC in the training group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Ten studies comprising a total of 1525 patients were quantitatively analyzed for hematoma expansion after cerebral hemorrhage using the radiomics method (4,6,7,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). The pooled Se, Sp, PPV, NPV, and DAR were 0.771 (0.710-0.832), 0.743 (0.684-0.801), 0.612 (0.448-0.737), 0.863 (0.815-0.912), and 0.748 (0.707-0.788), respectively (Figure 3).…”
Section: Diagnostic Test Meta-analysis 411 Radiomics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%