2018
DOI: 10.1159/000490576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Radical Nephrectomy and Partial Nephrectomy for T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Objective: To contrast the clinical effects and complications for the treatment of T1 renal carcinoma in partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN). Methods: Multiple databases were adopted to search relevant studies, and articles that eventually satisfied the inclusion criteria were included. All meta-analyses were conducted with the Review Manager 5.0, and to estimate the quality of each article, risk of bias table was performed. Results: In the end, 13 studies including 13,269 patients were invol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the patients underwent operations successfully which were selected in accordance with general population, and 15 patients with radical nephrectomy and 4 with partial nephrectomy. The 4 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy are still alive without local recurrence or distant metastasis with mean follow-up of 43 months, the same outcome as in general patients [17]. There were a large number of literatures on radical versus partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cell carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…All the patients underwent operations successfully which were selected in accordance with general population, and 15 patients with radical nephrectomy and 4 with partial nephrectomy. The 4 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy are still alive without local recurrence or distant metastasis with mean follow-up of 43 months, the same outcome as in general patients [17]. There were a large number of literatures on radical versus partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cell carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…All the patients underwent operations successfully which were selected in accordance with general population, and 15 patients with radical nephrectomy and 4 with partial nephrectomy. The 4 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy are still alive without local recurrence or distant metastasis with mean follow-up of 43 months, the same outcome as in general patients [17].There were a large number of literatures on radical versus partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cell carcinoma. A recent study consisted of a total number of 2459 adults in the united states who were treated with radical or partial nephrectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the matched cohort, patients in the PN group showed a longer OT and more EBL relative to those in the RN group. A systematic review and meta-analysis by Yang et al comprising 13 retrospective cohort studies with 13,269 patients showed that lower EBL was associated with PN and not RN for T1 renal tumor (25). Li et al reported a similar result in another metaanalysis (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A systematic review and meta-analysis by Yang et al. comprising 13 retrospective cohort studies with 13,269 patients showed that lower EBL was associated with PN and not RN for T1 renal tumor ( 25 ). Li et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%