2016 IEEE 10th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icaict.2016.7991734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of QoS architectures for VoIP traffics in IPv4 and IPv6

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has become necessary because of native IPv4's inability to guarantee packet delivery when congestion occurs. Mechanisms such as IntServ [2] and DiffServ [3] have been defined to overcome this shortcoming, and IPv6 was defined to be compatible with these QoS methods [4]. Diffserv has become the accepted method for applying QoS due to its scalability and lower impact on router resources.…”
Section: B Quality Of Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This has become necessary because of native IPv4's inability to guarantee packet delivery when congestion occurs. Mechanisms such as IntServ [2] and DiffServ [3] have been defined to overcome this shortcoming, and IPv6 was defined to be compatible with these QoS methods [4]. Diffserv has become the accepted method for applying QoS due to its scalability and lower impact on router resources.…”
Section: B Quality Of Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described above, there is a large body of research providing comparisons of QoS in native IPv4 and IPv6. There are also a number of studies that investigate performance of various transition methods [4], [6], [9]. A reoccurring theme for the various studies investigated is the lack of performance analysis during periods of congestion on the network.…”
Section: Rationale For This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation