A Systematic Review of Transition from IPV4 To IPV6

Ordabayeva, Gulzinat; Othman, Mohmed; Kirgizbayeva, B.; Iztaev, Zh. D.; Bayegizova, Aigulim

doi:10.1145/3410352.3410735

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Section: Ipv6mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Internet Protocol (IP) is a set of rules that defines how communication takes place between computer devices operating at the network layer in the OSI model and the Internet layer in the TCP/IP model [1]. There are several types of IP, such as IPv4, IPv6 and IPv10, but the most popular are IPv4 and IPv6 [1]. IPv6 is a standard protocol for communicating on networks like IPv4, but IPv6 has more IP addresses, a better address structure, provides greater security and supports mobile devices [17].…”

Section: Ipv6mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Internet Protocol (IP) addresses act as a host's identity when communicating on the Internet. The IP address of each host must be identical, in other words, each host has a different IP address [1]. Currently, internet users are increasing, based on APJJI data, internet users in Indonesia have reached 210 million [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparative Quality of Service Analysis of VPN Protocols on IPv6

Oktavia,

Priambodo,

Trianto

et al. 2024

j. nas. pendidik. teknik. inform.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increase in internet users has led to the depletion of IPv4 supplies and the increase in cyber attacks, one of which is data leakage incidents. Several innovations were created such as switching to IPv6 which provides more addresses and implementing VPN technology to secure internet communications. The solution using VPN is believed to secure the network from various types of attacks from outside the network by creating a tunnel with a certain encryption algorithm as a data exchange path. Some studies reveal that using VPN can cause delay which will affect QoS performance. Therefore, this research will be conducted to provide evidence as well as a comparison between the WireGuard and L2TP / IPSec VPN protocols on IPv6 based on Quality of Service parameters which include delay, jitter, packet loss, throughput, and MOS with three tests namely iPerf3, FTP, and remote desktop . The measurement is done by making a sample model with mikrotik and 6to4 tunnel. From the series of tests, it is known that the L2TP/IPSec protocol is better than the WireGuard protocol judging by the performance generated in tests with FTP and remote desktop. This discovery can be used by end users or other researchers to use VPN more objectively based on the technology.

show abstract

Section: Ipv6mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Ipv6mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparative Quality of Service Analysis of VPN Protocols on IPv6

Oktavia,

Priambodo,

Trianto

et al. 2024

j. nas. pendidik. teknik. inform.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…tables for neighbors, topology, database, and routing. EIGRPv6's default metrics for determining the optimum path are "bandwidth and latency," but dependability, load, and MTU can also be employed [28]. It transmits "welcome mails" to its neighbours every five seconds on FDDI networks and Ethernet, and every minute on SMDS links and Frame Relay [29].…”

Section: Eigrpv6mentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Comparison of OSPFV3 and EIGRP with IPv6 Network

Essah

Anand

2021

AJRCoS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A collection of interconnected devices that deal with communication protocols that are common to share resources provided by nodes of a network over digital interconnections is a computer network. The process of determining the most efficient route from a source to a given target is called routing. Cisco's Enriched Internal Routing Gateway Protocol for IPv6 and the IETF's OSPFv3 (First Version 3 of Open Shortest Path) are two of the most frequently studied IPv6 routing protocols among researchers (EIGRPv6). As a result of the popularity of EIGRPv6 and OSPFv3, it is necessary to undertake a thorough contrast of the two protocols once working inside a minor enterprise network on IPv6. Thus, the study analysed the performance comparison of OSPFV3 and EIGRP with IPv6 networks with regards to convergence time, end-to-end delay, and packet loss. Packet Tracer 6.2.2 was used to compare the performance of routing protocols of different kinds. In the simulation, Cisco routers, switches, and generic computers were employed in the test. In these topologies, standard IPv6 addresses have been used. The findings of the study revealed that EIGRPv6 outperforms OSPFv3. As a result, we advocate using EIGRPv6 as an internal routing protocol in a network of IPv6.

show abstract