2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of proximal row carpectomy and midcarpal arthrodesis for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC-wrist) and scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC-wrist) in stage II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
96
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
96
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study have caused us to be more cautious in offering PRC as an option to young laborers. Similar recommendations have been made by Dacho's and others, who recommended against PRC for patients engaged in heavy lifting or manual laborers [6,6,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of this study have caused us to be more cautious in offering PRC as an option to young laborers. Similar recommendations have been made by Dacho's and others, who recommended against PRC for patients engaged in heavy lifting or manual laborers [6,6,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Richou and colleagues reported a final DASH score of 31 in 24 patients followed for an average of 116 months [26]. Dacho noted a DASH score of 25 in 30 patients followed for 27 months [6]. Kremer noted a DASH scores of 26 in 45 patients followed for 32 months [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus believe that proximal row carpectomy should be preferred if both procedures are indicated. Only in specified situations, such as for patients carrying out heavy manual work, do some researchers recommend midcarpal arthrodesis due to the better grip strength postoperatively [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dacho et al looked at a group of 47 patients who showed increased arc of motion of 14°with PRC; however, there was increased grip strength with four-corner arthrodesis (72 % vs. 50 % of the contralateral side). They concluded that PRC was more favorable for those patients who required less grip strength for work [56].…”
Section: Prc Versus Four-corner Arthrodesismentioning
confidence: 99%