1996
DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(95)00082-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of predicted and measured performance of a large cavern in the Himalayas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Callari [12], R.K. Bhasin et al [13] and J.B. Martino et al [14] studied the pressure arch from different angles by using finite element or discrete element.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Callari [12], R.K. Bhasin et al [13] and J.B. Martino et al [14] studied the pressure arch from different angles by using finite element or discrete element.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is localized and as such has been ignored [25]. The rock mass properties, as presented in Table 2, have been used in the present analyses.…”
Section: Details Of the Fem Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of parametric studies have been carried out using DEM to estimate the behavior of rock masses with or without cavern, with one set or more than one set of discontinuities (Kulatilake et al, 1992;Cundall, 1993;Souley and Homand, 1996; Shne and Barton, 1997; Bhasin and . The DEM has also been applied to the construction sites containing underground structures and the numerical results have been compared with the measured performance (Bhasin et al, 1996;Souley et al, 1997). However, the cases using DEM to assess the performance of underground caverns are still few, and the standard routine of DEM modelling, such as the determination of mechanical properties and the modelling procedure have not been established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%