2021 20th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icar53236.2021.9659380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Position and Torque Whole-Body Control Schemes on the Humanoid Robot TALOS

Abstract: Most control architectures for legged locomotion are either torque or position controlled. In this paper, we investigate their differences and performances. Aiming to choose the most appropriate scheme for the robot TALOS, we benchmark three control schemes: The first one optimizes joint velocities based on hierarchical quadratic programming; the second one optimizes joint accelerations based on weighted quadratic programming; and the last one optimizes joint torques, also based on weighted quadratic programmi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. TALOS's hip flexibility has a significant impact on its leg control and, as a result, its balance and locomotion [6]. Since the hip flexibility is due to the vertical linkage following previous work [10], we model the flexibility along the pitch and roll axis for each leg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1. TALOS's hip flexibility has a significant impact on its leg control and, as a result, its balance and locomotion [6]. Since the hip flexibility is due to the vertical linkage following previous work [10], we model the flexibility along the pitch and roll axis for each leg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The whole-body control layer typically assumes that all robot links are rigid bodies, which models correctly the whole-body motion in most cases [4], [5], [6], but becomes problematic with even small link deflections. This problem is common in heavy robot with mechanical weakness in their structure, such as the robot Talos (≈ 100 kg), whose hips bend while walking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the CoM and the footsteps trajectories are computed, they have to be executed on the robot through a whole-body controller. In this article, we used the torque controller introduced in [25], [26]. It is a weighted quadratic program based on the Task Space Inverse Dynamic (TSID) library [27].…”
Section: B Whole-body Controller Of the Robotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, besides the ground reac-tion forces that are exchanged when dealing with legged robots (Liu et al, 2016), no optimal controller is currently formulated to describe the multiple types of interaction that can occur with the environment or, in a more complex case, with a human, as discussed above. In particular, current optimization-based controllers consider simple tasks that do not include environmental interaction, such as constrained pick and place (Escande et al, 2014;Flacco and De Luca, 2015) or trajectory tracking (Hoffman et al, 2018;Ramuzat et al, 2021). On the other hand, the works that account for physical interaction often employ nonoptimal formulations, which exploit a closed-form impedance controller to absorb any unforeseen force and perturbation (Pollayil et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%