Comparison of Porous and Non‐Porous Teflon Membranes Plus a Xenograft in the Treatment of Vertical Osseous Defects: A Clinical Reentry Study

Walters, Stephen; Greenwell, Henry; Hill, Margaret; Drisko, Connie L.; Pickman, Kim; Scheetz, James P.

doi:10.1902/jop.2003.74.8.1161

Cited by 34 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 76 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…PepGen/P-15® (Dentsply Friadent Ceramed, Lakewood, CO, USA) has been used in several bone augmentation procedures, such as socket site preservation, (Hahn et al 2003, Tehemar et al 2003 ridge deficiency (Barboza et al 2002), maxillary sinus grafting, , Degidi et al 2004, Gelbart et al 2005, Philippart et al 2005 and periodontal defects (Yukna et al 1998, Walters et al 2003. However, to a large extent, the above data rely on in vitro observations (Qian and Bhatnagar 1996, Bhatnagar et al 1999, Bhatnagar et al 1997 When PepGen/P-15 was examined in surgical fenestrated membrane-protected periodontal defects in dogs (Artzi et al 2006), it proved to be biocompatible and osteoconductive material (Fig.…”

Section: Growth and Differentiation Factors For Alveolar Ridge Augmenmentioning

confidence: 99%

Augmentation and Preservation of the Alveolar Process and Alveolar Ridge of Bone

Tal¹,

Artzi²,

Kolerman³

et al. 2012

Bone Regeneration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Growth and Differentiation Factors For Alveolar Ridge Augmenmentioning

confidence: 99%

Augmentation and Preservation of the Alveolar Process and Alveolar Ridge of Bone

Tal¹,

Artzi²,

Kolerman³

et al. 2012

Bone Regeneration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Outras membranas não-absorvíveis também foram estudadas, como membranas de poli-tetrafluoroetileno (PTFE) (WALTERS et al, 2003), silicone (Biobrane®) (WARRER; KARRING, 1992) e celulose (NOVAES JÚNIOR. et al, 1993).…”

Section: Revisãounclassified

“…et al, 1993). Estudos indicam um melhor preenchimento dos defeitos obtidos com o uso de uma membrana não-absorvível (WALTERS et al, 2003). Contudo, este tipo de membrana apresenta algumas desvantagens como: necessidade de segunda intervenção cirúrgica para remoção e elevada taxa de exposição da membrana devido recessão gengival, desconforto para o paciente, elevado custo e infecções pós-operatórias (SIMION et al, 1999).…”

Section: Revisãounclassified

Uso de membrana biossintética a base de celulose na regeneração tecidual guiada

Iamaguti

Brandão

2007

Sem. Ci. Agr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoA Regeneração Tecidual Guiada (RTG) consiste numa modalidade de tratamento regenerativo que requer a colocação de uma barreira física sobre o defeito ósseo, de modo que a proliferação de tecidos moles adjacentes para dentro da área protegida seja evitada. Assim, a regeneração óssea guiada permite que células com potencial osteogênico das margens ósseas existentes invadam o espaço criado e produzam osso. As barreiras físicas devem ser biocompatíveis, permitir a oclusão celular, manutenção do espaço, integração tecidual e facilidade de uso. Podem ser oclusivas ou permeáveis, absorvíveis ou não-absorvíveis. Dentre os vários tipos de barreiras físicas existentes no mercado, a membrana biossintética a base de celulose vem se destacando, pois, além de possuir as características necessárias para a RTG, trata-se de um produto nacional desenvolvido a baixos custos. Palavras-chave: Regeneração tecidual guiada, cartilagem articular, membrana de celulose AbstractGuided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) is a regenerative treatment modality that requires the placement of a physical barrier over a bone defect in such a way that the proliferation of the surrounding soft tissues into the barrier-protected area is prevented. Thereby in the guided osseous regeneration allowing boneforming cells from the existent bone edges to invade the space and produce bone. The physical barriers should be biocompatible, allow cellular occlusion, maintain adequate space, tissue integration and facility in the application. They can be occlusive or permeable, absorbable or non-absorbable. Among various types of physical barriers in the market, the cellulose biosynthetic membrane is emphasizing by the necessary characteristics for GTR and to be a national product developed in low cost.

show abstract

“…This surgical method leads to desirable outcomes in intrabony defects [2][3][4]. Pontoriero et al [5,6] reported that the guided tissue regeneration technique led to new attachments and alveolar bone formation in Class II furcation defects; however, success rates were lower when Class III furcation defects were ≥ 4 mm.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of autogenous tooth bone graft with membrane on Class II furcation defects in dogs: A histologic and histomorphometric study

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

·············································································································································································The study evaluated the efficacy of combining autogenous tooth bone grafts with membranes in surgically created class II furcation defects. Thirty teeth of 10 dogs were assessed. Furcation defects (5 × 4 × 3 mm 3 ) were created in the lower third and fourth premolars. Defects in the control, experimental-1, and experimental-2 groups were treated with non-resorbable membranes only, autogenous tooth bone grafts with non-resorbable membranes, and autogenous tooth bone grafts with resorbable membranes, respectively. Healing patterns were observed 4 to 8 weeks after treatment. Mesio-distal sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and histological and histomorphometrical analyses were performed. Four weeks after treatment, connective tissue and autogenous tooth bone graft materials with newly formed bone were observed. Partial recovery of periodontal ligament-like tissue and formation of cementum-like tissue at root surfaces also occurred. Eight weeks after treatment, mature bone tissue formation was noted. In addition, regular thickness of cementum-like tissue at root surfaces, and improved periodontal ligament-like tissue were observed. Areas of newly formed tissue were 92.2% ± 13.0%, 97.4% ± 4.4%, and 98.1% ± 2.8% at 4 weeks after treatment, and 96.7% ± 3.7%, 96.8% ± 5.7%, and 99.6% ± 0.8% by 8 weeks post-treatment, in the control, experimental-1, and experimental-2 groups, respectively. Regeneration of defective tissues occurred in the experimental group compared with the control group, but not significantly. This study showed that combining autogenous tooth bone grafts with membranes in class II furcation defects improves healing efficiency.

show abstract

Comparison of Porous and Non‐Porous Teflon Membranes Plus a Xenograft in the Treatment of Vertical Osseous Defects: A Clinical Reentry Study

Abstract: Treatment of vertical osseous defects with nonporous or porous polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in combination with a xenograft resulted in statistically significant improvement in open and closed probing measurements, with no significant difference between treatment groups.

Cited by 34 publications

References 76 publications

Augmentation and Preservation of the Alveolar Process and Alveolar Ridge of Bone

Augmentation and Preservation of the Alveolar Process and Alveolar Ridge of Bone

Uso de membrana biossintética a base de celulose na regeneração tecidual guiada

Effect of autogenous tooth bone graft with membrane on Class II furcation defects in dogs: A histologic and histomorphometric study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About