2014
DOI: 10.1002/app.40588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of polyelectrolyte and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate as dispersants for multiwalled carbon nanotubes on cotton fabrics for electromagnetic interference shielding

Abstract: Cotton fabrics with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) dispersed by Nafion, a polyelectrolyte, and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS), a surfactant, were prepared for electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding. The fabrics were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and vector network analysis. The fabrics with the Nafion–MWCNT coating possessed a better shielding efficiency (SE) than those with the SDBS–MWCNT coating because of a more uniform dispersion of MWCNTs, which improved the electrica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the EMI shielding performance is increased to 44 and 54 dB by laminating two (0.73 mm) and three (1.2 mm) pieces of the fabric at a fixed frequency of 10 GHz. These SE values are superior to many of the reported EMI shielding fabrics, including PANI/PPy/PAN fabric (∼25 dB, 30−1500 MHz), 51 PPy/GO wool fabric (22.2 dB, Xband), 52 CB/PVA/NRL cotton fabric (37.7 dB, X-band), 53 MWCNT/cotton fabric (11.5 dB, X-band), 54 etc. To explore the EMI shielding mechanism of the AgNP-deposited PAF fabric, the total EMI shielding effectiveness (SE T ), microwave absorption (SE A ), and microwave reflection (SE R ) at a frequency of 10 GHz were investigated.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Furthermore, the EMI shielding performance is increased to 44 and 54 dB by laminating two (0.73 mm) and three (1.2 mm) pieces of the fabric at a fixed frequency of 10 GHz. These SE values are superior to many of the reported EMI shielding fabrics, including PANI/PPy/PAN fabric (∼25 dB, 30−1500 MHz), 51 PPy/GO wool fabric (22.2 dB, Xband), 52 CB/PVA/NRL cotton fabric (37.7 dB, X-band), 53 MWCNT/cotton fabric (11.5 dB, X-band), 54 etc. To explore the EMI shielding mechanism of the AgNP-deposited PAF fabric, the total EMI shielding effectiveness (SE T ), microwave absorption (SE A ), and microwave reflection (SE R ) at a frequency of 10 GHz were investigated.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Before EMW enters into the shielding composite, a large part of the EMW was reflected from the first interface, and the EMW entering into the EMI shielding material was mainly absorbed . Comprehensively considering SE and SSE, as shown in Figure e,f, and Table S3, the shielding performance of our EMI shielding material is equivalent to that of the recently published shielding material. ,,,,, However, the density of CoFe/C/HCF-800 is only 0.28 g/cm 3 , and its EMI shielding performance and its SSE can reach 30.7 dB and 109.64 dB·cm 3 /g, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A vector network analyzer (VNA, Agilent N5424A) was used to measure the SE in the frequency range of 8.2–12.4 GHz (X-band), which is widely used in many applications, such as Doppler radar, TV signal transmissions, mobile phone relay systems, and other communication technologies [ 37 ]. The sample size is fixed at 22.86 × 10.86 mm 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%