1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00879832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of point cloudiness and sunshine derived cloud cover in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies involving a comparison of cloud shade with point cloudiness (Hoyt, 1977;Raju and Karuna Kumar, 1982;Rangarajan et al, 1984) monthly mean values of whole day fractional bright sunshine and point cloudiness were used. As a result, the dependence of cloud shade on solar elevation was largely masked by the whole-day averaging process.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies involving a comparison of cloud shade with point cloudiness (Hoyt, 1977;Raju and Karuna Kumar, 1982;Rangarajan et al, 1984) monthly mean values of whole day fractional bright sunshine and point cloudiness were used. As a result, the dependence of cloud shade on solar elevation was largely masked by the whole-day averaging process.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the fraction of possible bright sunshine is often measured directly with a sunshine recorder from which, of course, cloud cover may be inferred. However, it has been shown that there is a systematic discrepancy between monthly mean values of cloud cover estimated by eye and the corresponding cloud cover derived from direct sunshine-recorder measurements (Brooks, 1929;Hoyt, 1977;Raju and Karuna Kumar, 1982;Rangarajan et al, 1984;Harrison and Coombes, 1986). The cloud cover estimated by eye can be higher than that derived from sunshine measurements by as much as 0.4 but this difference decreases with increasing latitude.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In some cases, ground-based observers see the sides of large vertical clouds and add them to total cloud cover. This visual error can overestimate the amount of cloud cover by 10 to 20%, or even up to (Cicenko, 1975;Raju and Karuna Kumar, 1982). Webster (1969) had noted surprisingly long sunshine durations in the presence of nearly 100% Cumulus cloud cover.…”
Section: Influence Of Selected Cloud Genera On Sunshine Duration At Noonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chagnon (1981) found virtually the same results for the midwest United States during the period 1901-1977. Raju and Kumar (1982) argued that the fraction of possible sunshine will closely approximate the fraction of possible clear weather when averaged over long term periods in any given region, and they demonstrated how sunshine derived cloud cover in India can be considered a better measurement of actual cloud cover than visual estimates of cloudiness.…”
Section: Synoptic Obser6ations Of Cloudiness and Comparison With The mentioning
confidence: 99%