1979
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1979.236.6.h899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of plethysmographic methods with pulsed Doppler blood flowmetry

Abstract: Hand blood flow was measured at rest, with local warming, and with local cooling. Three methods were simultaneously used: water plethysmography (WP), mercury-in-rubber strain gauge plethysmography (SG), and pulsed Döppler flowmetry (D). Of these, water plethysmography is the most sensitive and accurate; strain gauge plethysmography is simpler but less accurate; and pulsed Döppler flowmetry precisely measures instantaneous arterial blood flow without venous occlusion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
3

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The strong relationship between VOP and DU blood flow measurements in the present study is in line with previous studies reporting correlation coefficients varying from 0.57 to 0.99 at rest and during exercise [14, 16, 27]. Head-up tilt affects muscle blood flow more than skin blood flow [21, 28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The strong relationship between VOP and DU blood flow measurements in the present study is in line with previous studies reporting correlation coefficients varying from 0.57 to 0.99 at rest and during exercise [14, 16, 27]. Head-up tilt affects muscle blood flow more than skin blood flow [21, 28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Forearm blood flow was measured with a mercury in sylastic strain-gauge plethysmograph using a venous occlusion technique as previously described (27). The strain gauge was placed -5 cm below the antecubital crease.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adjustable rangegated time system of reception enables one, by means of an electronic gate, to compute both the time delay and the duration of the received signal -i.e. the depth and the width of the measurement volume of Doppler signals: 12 this permits one to determine the arterial diameter (D) and to sample cross-sectional velocity (V) of an artery as follows: the arterial diameter is deduced from a peak to peak velocity profile ( 2) the arterial diameter is calculated as : D = 0.4 mm x N x Sin. 60°, 60°b eing the ultrasound beam incidence angle with the vessel axis; the accuracy of such pulsed Doppler arterial diameter measurements was tested previously in vitro with calibrated latex tubes; this accuracy is again confirmed in this study by the existence of significant correlation between the common carotid artery diameter measured by arteriography and that calculated by the pulsed Doppler methods in all the patients (r = 0.77; p < 0.001).…”
Section: Description Of the Pulsed Doppler Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%