Comparison of Physicians and Nurses' Attitudes toward Family Presence during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Cho, Jeong Lim; Lee, Eun Nam; Sim, Sang Hee; Lee, Na Youn

doi:10.7475/kjan.2013.25.1.41

Cited by 13 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…While this was higher than that found among physicians (2.874) and nurses (2.88) in a Taiwanese study that used the same instrument (Lai et al, 2017), it was similar to the results for physicians (3.41) and nurses (3.30) found in another Korean study (Cha, 2018). Further, only 41.3% of the participants in our study had experienced FPDR, which is a low rate, similar to that reported by a previous study (Cho et al, 2013). Another study, which reported that 48% of 124 ICU nurses with abundant CPR experience never advised families to be present during resuscitation and that 45% had only invited families 1–5 times, confirms that FPDR is primarily determined by healthcare providers (Powers & Candela, 2017).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Predicting nurses' intentions in allowing family presence during resuscitation: A cross‐sectional survey

Park

2021

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims and Objectives This study examined nurses' intention to allow family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) by applying the theory of planned behaviour with an extended concept. Background Medical institutions, including nurses and other medical professionals working in emergency and intensive care units, are reluctant to allow FPDR. However, this practice reduces the family's anxiety and stress while fostering well‐being and minimises their feelings of helplessness and distress by making them believe that they have helped the patient. Design A cross‐sectional descriptive design was used in this study. Methods The participants were 252 nurses who had been working for at least 3 months in a general hospital in South Korea. Data were collected using self‐report questionnaires in April 2020 and were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis. The instruments were intention to allow FPDR (five constructs: intention to allow FPDR, positive attitude, negative attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control), perception of FPDR and self‐confidence. The STROBE checklist was used for reporting this study. Results The mean score for the intention to allow FPDR was 3.47 out of 5. The regression analysis results indicated that perception of FPDR, positive attitude and negative attitude predicted the intention to allow FPDR. Conclusions It is necessary to develop educational programmes to change the perceptions of and attitudes towards FPDR. Additionally, written policies and protocols for FPDR in South Korea are needed to develop systematic care for patients’ families during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Relevance to clinical practice The findings of this study provide baseline data for developing FPDR policies and guidelines that could minimise the family's distress and allow them to feel that they have helped the patient.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Predicting nurses' intentions in allowing family presence during resuscitation: A cross‐sectional survey

Park

2021

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(23) However, in South Korea, researchers have suggested developing and implementing an educational program to modify the negative perception of professionals about the presence of families in ER. (24) These studies, therefore, show that changes in the formative process collaborate to diminish the symbolic culture of professional exclusion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Decidindo “caso a caso” a presença familiar no serviço de atendimento emergencial

Barreto¹,

Marcon

García-Vivar³

et al. 2018

Acta paul. enferm.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo Objetivo Compreender como médicos e enfermeiros vivenciam e percebem a presença da família no serviço de atendimento emergencial. Métodos Estudo qualitativo que utilizou o Interacionismo Simbólico como referencial teórico e a Teoria Fundamentada nos Dados como referencial metodológico. Participaram 20 profissionais – divididos equitativamente entre médicos e enfermeiros – que atuavam em duas Salas de Emergência localizadas no Sul do Brasil. Os dados foram coletados entre outubro de 2016 e fevereiro de 2017, por meio de entrevistas. Resultados Identificou-se a existência de uma cultura social de exclusão familiar, amplamente difundida e praticada pelos profissionais. Contudo, às vezes, as famílias permanecem com seus entes queridos na Sala de Emergência, visto que os profissionais analisam e decidem “caso a caso”, considerando diferentes aspectos ao longo do processo assistencial. Conclusão Para médicos e enfermeiros múltiplos aspectos estão relacionados na determinação da presença familiar durante o atendimento emergencial. Assim, não é aconselhável uma diretiva única para a presença da família. Em realidade, sugere-se que cada unidade de saúde elabore seus protocolos considerando as particularidades locais.

show abstract

“…또한, 심폐소생술 시 가 족입회가 원활히 이루어질 수 있도록 심폐소생술 시 가족입회에 대한 가이드라인이 제시되고 있다 [1,11,12]. 국내에서도 보호자 로부터 심폐소생술 시 가족입회를 요청받는 의료인들이 점차 많 아지고 있긴 하지만 [13,14]…”

unclassified

Validity and Reliability of Korean Version of the Attitude Measurement Tool for Family Presence during Resuscitation

이

정

2020

Korean J Adult Nurs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to examine the validity and reliability of Korean version of the attitude measurement tool for Family Presence during Resuscitation (K-FPDR). Methods: Data were collected from 299 nurses working at a tertiary hospital located in Seoul via structured-questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS 24.0 and AMOS 21.0. To examine the validity and reliability of K-FPDR, content/construct validity using exploratory/ confirmatory factor analysis and reliability test and criterion validity using Pearson correlation coefficient were conducted. Results: There were 6 of the 30 items deleted through content/construct validity test. The Korean version of K-FPDR was composed of three dimensions: benefits, negative effects, and decision-making on K-FPDR. K-FPDR was validated by confirmatory factor analysis (CFI=.82, GFI=.86, AGFI=.83, RMR=.07, and RMSEA= .07), and factor loading of the 24 items ranged from .40 to .82. In terms of criterion validity, the K-FPDR positively correlated with Family Presence Self-Confidence Scale. Also, the reliability of the scale was confirmed with Cronbach's ⍺=.85. Conclusion: The K-FPDR is a reliable and valid scale; therefore, this scale is expected to be useful in measuring the attitude toward family presence during resuscitation among Korean nurses.

show abstract

Comparison of Physicians and Nurses' Attitudes toward Family Presence during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Cited by 13 publications

References 10 publications

Predicting nurses' intentions in allowing family presence during resuscitation: A cross‐sectional survey

Predicting nurses' intentions in allowing family presence during resuscitation: A cross‐sectional survey

Decidindo “caso a caso” a presença familiar no serviço de atendimento emergencial

Validity and Reliability of Korean Version of the Attitude Measurement Tool for Family Presence during Resuscitation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About