2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of pedicled buccal fat pad flap with buccal flap for closure of oro-antral communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
34
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
34
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Palatal rotation flap is preferred for oroantral fistula closure with large defects, having 76.9% success rate thanks to its vascular pedicle. 5,10 Additionally autogenous and alloplastic graft materials are used to separate the sinus membrane and oral mucosa to facilitate the closure and subsequent implant operation or sinus lifting procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Palatal rotation flap is preferred for oroantral fistula closure with large defects, having 76.9% success rate thanks to its vascular pedicle. 5,10 Additionally autogenous and alloplastic graft materials are used to separate the sinus membrane and oral mucosa to facilitate the closure and subsequent implant operation or sinus lifting procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be kept in mind that BFP should be exposed by blunt dissection without causing any tension to pull it out [10]. The use of the BFP in patients with prior local radiotherapy, malar hypoplasia or thin cheeks are relative contraindications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wide pool of patient selection regardless of general condition and age Despite the high success rates ranging from 96.7% 14) and 98% 10) to 100% 11) some complications have been cited in previous literature,such as limited mouth opening 10,11,15) , prolonged pain 10) , cheek deformity 10,11) , and prosthetic problems due to change of vestibule 10) , partial loss of flap 10,[13][14][15][16] , hematoma and hemor rhage due to a pedicle of the flap 17) , and recur rent oroantral communi cations 10,11,13) . Most of these complications have been attributed to low experience or invasive sur gery 18) . Buccal fat must be exposed by blunt dissection and handled carefully so that the small blood vessels of the thin capsule are not damaged, thereby reducing hemorrhage and swelling 18,19) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these complications have been attributed to low experience or invasive sur gery 18) . Buccal fat must be exposed by blunt dissection and handled carefully so that the small blood vessels of the thin capsule are not damaged, thereby reducing hemorrhage and swelling 18,19) . In addition, knowledge of the pad's size limitation is crucial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%