2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of particle swarm and genetic algorithm based design algorithms for PV-hybrid systems with battery and hydrogen storage path

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper we chose a simple reference application of a stand-alone photovoltaic (PV) hybrid system with battery and hydrogen storage for a single family home (s. Figure 1). Numerous example applications demonstrate the great potentials of this HESS configuration [3][4][5][6] and point out both the necessity of a good, adapted design and sizing [5] of installed capacities and powers of the energy storage components and the importance of an intelligent energy management (EM) for the optimal control of the power flows within the HESS [4]. There are energy management concepts [4,6,7], with fuzzy logic controller based approaches being commonly used.…”
Section: Fc Elmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we chose a simple reference application of a stand-alone photovoltaic (PV) hybrid system with battery and hydrogen storage for a single family home (s. Figure 1). Numerous example applications demonstrate the great potentials of this HESS configuration [3][4][5][6] and point out both the necessity of a good, adapted design and sizing [5] of installed capacities and powers of the energy storage components and the importance of an intelligent energy management (EM) for the optimal control of the power flows within the HESS [4]. There are energy management concepts [4,6,7], with fuzzy logic controller based approaches being commonly used.…”
Section: Fc Elmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there should be a focus on increasing component lifetime to defer reinvestment. For a new system, a co-design of component sizes and control approach is possible and desirable [31,32]. Increased efficiency allows smaller sized components, saving costs and resources.…”
Section: Energy Management: Problem Structure and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas in some studies, PSO algorithms generally have performance that is as good as genetic algorithms. Even in some cases, PSO can exceed the performance of genetic algorithms [20]. Another advantage is that PSO has fewer function evaluations than genetic algorithms, so that it has a relatively better level of computational efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%