2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of optimal point on the sternum for chest compression between obese and normal weight individuals with respect to body mass index, using computer tomography: A retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2). 17) We estimated several parameters on the axial view that showed the midpoint of the lower half of the sternum in two groups: (1) external chest AP diameter (mm), from the skin on the sternum vertically to the skin on the back;…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). 17) We estimated several parameters on the axial view that showed the midpoint of the lower half of the sternum in two groups: (1) external chest AP diameter (mm), from the skin on the sternum vertically to the skin on the back;…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have shown that the optimal compression point was found 3 cm left of the origo [35]. It has also been suggested that in obese individuals the appropriate place of compressions may be higher than was indicated previously [36]. Summarising, the compression quality formula should not include this parameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…According to cardiac pump theory 38 , in order to provide high-quality chest compression, the rescuer's hands should be placed on the lower half of the sternum 39 where the maximal left ventricle diameter is assumed to be 40 . Lee et al 41 . evaluated the point of maximal left ventricular diameter by examining CT scans, which was noted to be more cranial in patients of obese than of normal weight.…”
Section: Anthropometric Parameters For Central Obesity Several Commomentioning
confidence: 99%